2012/7/10 Brett Porter <[email protected]>: > > On 10/07/2012, at 3:38 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'd like to start the release process for a 1.4-M3 (including the new UI !!). >> Any objections ? > > Great! > >> I will start that around end of july (need vacations first :-) ). (yes >> Brett French folks has a lot :P ). > > :D > >> >> As this release will need to release a LOT of stuff (redback >> core/components now imported in asf scm), I wonder what is the best >> strategy: >> * release redback components then call a vote, release redback core >> then call a vote, release archiva then call a vote. >> * release everything in one block then call a vote >> >> Perso I prefer 2nd mode (can be faster) > > I think that makes sense. Do the components need to be separate releases, or > should they just be folded in as 1.4-M3-SNAPSHOT as well since they are under > the Archiva group? currently: * redback core has groupId: org.apache.archiva.redback * redback components: org.apache.archiva.redback.components
You mean only one tree of sources ? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/archiva/trunk/ /redback-components /redback-core ? Yup that could ease the release but we will release everything all the time and increase build time. > > Also, should the relevant parts of the red back site be folded into Archiva's? I have started some stuff: * core: http://archiva.apache.org/redback/ * components: http://archiva.apache.org/redback/components/ > > - Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > [email protected] > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > -- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
