On 10/07/2012, at 6:00 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: >> >> I think that makes sense. Do the components need to be separate releases, or >> should they just be folded in as 1.4-M3-SNAPSHOT as well since they are >> under the Archiva group? > currently: > * redback core has groupId: org.apache.archiva.redback > * redback components: org.apache.archiva.redback.components > > You mean only one tree of sources ? > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/archiva/trunk/ > > /redback-components > /redback-core > ? > > Yup that could ease the release but we will release everything all the > time and increase build time.
Good point. Maybe ok to be separate for now, but over time I anticipate we'd fold it in / trim it out… my other concern was to make sure it's not too hard for contributors to build Archiva. > >> >> Also, should the relevant parts of the red back site be folded into >> Archiva's? > I have started some stuff: > * core: http://archiva.apache.org/redback/ > * components: http://archiva.apache.org/redback/components/ I was thinking of folding in the important bits to: http://archiva.apache.org/docs/1.4-SNAPSHOT/adminguide/security.html and http://archiva.apache.org/ref/1.4-SNAPSHOT/ Happy to work on that, just wondering if it's a good idea. - Brett -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
