Cool, thanks Olivier! :) On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2012/8/28 Deng Ching <[email protected]>: > > +1 > > > > AFAIK, most of our users are using either 1.3.5 of 1.4-M2 so it should > > probably be fine to keep just n & n-1 reference.. > > Sure. > So I did the job (sorry for email spamming :-) ). > The svn path is here: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/archiva/site-content/ > Most of the content has been imported and pom configured ! > I will ask infra to use this for sync live to archiva.a.o > > > > > > Thanks, > > Deng > > > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> I'd like we move our site to svnpub (faster prod live around 2/3 > >> minutes after the commit really faster than the rsync :-) ). > >> I have tested that on an other Apache project > >> (http://directmemory.apache.org) with the maven plugin > >> (http://maven.apache.org/sandbox/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/). > >> > >> First I have to import some content from p.a.o. > >> Question are we sure about keep all of those versionned documentation > >> (http://archiva.apache.org/docs/). > >> Having n and n-1 sounds enough for me. > >> > >> WDYT ? > >> > >> Thanks > >> -- > >> Olivier Lamy > >> Talend: http://coders.talend.com > >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > >> > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > Talend: http://coders.talend.com > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >
