done. Now site deployment is really fast :-) 2012/8/29 Deng Ching <[email protected]>: > Cool, thanks Olivier! :) > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2012/8/28 Deng Ching <[email protected]>: >> > +1 >> > >> > AFAIK, most of our users are using either 1.3.5 of 1.4-M2 so it should >> > probably be fine to keep just n & n-1 reference.. >> >> Sure. >> So I did the job (sorry for email spamming :-) ). >> The svn path is here: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/archiva/site-content/ >> Most of the content has been imported and pom configured ! >> I will ask infra to use this for sync live to archiva.a.o >> >> >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Deng >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> I'd like we move our site to svnpub (faster prod live around 2/3 >> >> minutes after the commit really faster than the rsync :-) ). >> >> I have tested that on an other Apache project >> >> (http://directmemory.apache.org) with the maven plugin >> >> (http://maven.apache.org/sandbox/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/). >> >> >> >> First I have to import some content from p.a.o. >> >> Question are we sure about keep all of those versionned documentation >> >> (http://archiva.apache.org/docs/). >> >> Having n and n-1 sounds enough for me. >> >> >> >> WDYT ? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> -- >> >> Olivier Lamy >> >> Talend: http://coders.talend.com >> >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> Talend: http://coders.talend.com >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >>
-- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
