Oh, wrong, I put the jpa module dependencies into 
        redback-common-integrations/pom.xml
But the questions remain the same ;-)


Am Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016, 19:57:26 CEST schrieb Martin Stockhammer:
> Ok, I got it. It was hidden in pom dependencies.
> The dependencies for the redback-users provider implementations are  hidden
> deeper  in the dependency tree (e.g. redback-users-jdo is a dependency in
> redback-rbac-cached).
> 
> I put the jpa modules into the redback-core pom as dependency, but not sure
> if this is the right place.
> 
> So two questions:
> - I think the dependency of redback-users-jdo in the pom of redback-rbac-
> cached is wrong and should be moved into the test scope. Am I right?
> - Wouldn't it make sense to set the users and rbac provider implementations
> that archiva uses/knows explicitly as maven dependency in the web
> application pom?
> 
> 
> Martin
> 
> Am Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016, 12:56:50 CEST schrieb Martin:
> > So, as I can see it seems to be more a packaging / dependency problem.
> > The new modules are not copied to WEB-INF/lib of the created application.
> > 
> > So I think I have to mention the modules somewhere in the pom.xml as
> > dependency. But currently I do not know where. They are added as modules
> > to
> > the parent module (e.g. redback-users-provider), but I think they must be
> > added somewhere else. redback-users-ldap and redback-users-jdo seems to be
> > loaded by some magic, or deeper dependencies that I currently  do not see.
> > 
> > Greetings
> > 
> > Martin
> > 
> > Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016, 22:27:18 CEST schrieb Martin:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I currently try to load the new redback jpa modules into the archiva
> > > application. But I'm a bit lost. The spring-context.xml seems not to be
> > > loaded from these files. So how does the spring starter know which
> > > context
> > > files to load? Is there anywhere a master file or something, or does it
> > > only work by classpath scanning? If so, do I have to add additionally
> > > somewhere the dependencies to these modules?
> > > 
> > > Greetings
> > > 
> > > Martin


Reply via email to