Eclipse plugins seem to use a dot separated format for their plugins. If we're moving closer to eclipse technologies and we're planning renaming anyway then it would seem more sensible to keep to their apparent standard.
I'd be all for that. Bob. On 08/04/2008, Tom Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe if I am also to extract the other diagrams then you should go > > for argouml-core-diagram-sequence2 just to make it clear that this is > > a replacement version of argouml-core-diagram-sequence > > > I think sequence2 is definitely better than sequence. > > As far as the base names go, many projects seem to use a 1:1 > correspondence between the package name, Eclipse project name, and > plugin name. If folks think they might want to do this in the next > few years, now is the time to do it. > > I don't have a strong preference one way or the other. The current > scheme has the advantage that it doesn't require changes. Switching > from the argouml-core-model style to org.argouml.model has the (minor) > advantage of making us like the rest of the cool kids and keeping all > the names aligned, but has the disadvantage of requiring more changes. > > If anyone cares one way or the other, now is the time to speak up! > > > Tom > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
