2008/12/2 Tom Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That's a good idea, but defining the template is going to require a > holistic view of the entire system which is not something I'm > confident that I have.
Precisely why I gave up my previous attempt at this, such global change worried me. There are a few diagrams such as deployment, activity, and state that I've looked at very little and I worried of getting the blame for breaking them. I think what your doing is a great move forward though. Every bit of refactoring makes the next thing to do clearer maybe something like I suggest can follow up afterwards in a subsequent release. It wouldn't change the signature of the constructor again or change the public API. Cheers Bob. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
