Hello Shane!
As Tom implied, nowadays the releases are built from several projects and
not only the argouml project. The release is controlled from scripts in the
argoumlinstaller project. The projects involved are currently:
argouml \
argouml-cpp \
argouml-csharp \
argouml-idl \
argouml-java \
argouml-php \
argouml-sql \
\
argouml-de argouml-es argouml-en-gb argouml-fr argouml-it argouml-nb \
argouml-pt argouml-pt-br \
argouml-ru \
argouml-i18n-zh \
\
argouml-documentation
So, at some point in the past (could be what you have detected), the release
building part of the controlling files was moved out of the argouml project
into the argoumlinstaller project and the source was also split over several
files.
/Linus
2009/12/21 Shane McIntosh <[email protected]>
> Tom Morris wrote:
> > Fetched from which FTP site(s) or SVN repository(ies)? Including which
> > files? What tags or branches? Are you analyzing the main project
> > only? Everything which makes up the product as distributed? All
> > ArgoUML-related code hosted on Tigris including optional plugin
> > modules?
> >
> > To be more explicit, although it's a reasonable assumption to think
> > that all of the relevant code to build ArgoUML, the product, would be
> > found in the Tigris project named "argouml," that is not, in point of
> > fact, how things work. If your analysis proceeds based on that
> > assumption, it's missing a bunch of stuff.
> >
> > In a quick glance at the diff beween the main project's build.xml file
> > for 0.22 and 0.20 (look here
> >
> http://argouml.tigris.org/source/browse/argouml/releases/VERSION_0_22/src_new/build.xml?r1=9684&r2=10969
> > to see what I'm looking at), I see that a whole stack of I18N stuff
> > was moved out of the main project as well as a bunch of plugin modules
> > like the C++ module. Did you track them to their new homes or exclude
> > them from both analyses or just analyze different portions of the
> > product for each release?
> >
> > Tom
> >
>
> I sampled each project at the customer release level. For ArgoUML, I
> consulted the webpage listing for the names of the customer releases
> (http://argouml-downloads.tigris.org/). All entries under "Releases"
> were considered. I then checked out the sources for the corresponding
> tags from the "releases" area of the argouml tigris SVN repository
> (http://argouml.tigris.org/source/browse/argouml/releases/). For
> example, I assumed that Release 0.10.1 corresponded to the SVN tagged
> release VERSION_0_10_1 in the "releases" area. I also trusted that this
> tagged version contained all the necessary and related code. Were these
> assumptions incorrect?
>
> -Shane
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2432067
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [
> [email protected]].
> To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator,
> email: [[email protected]]
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2432221
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
[[email protected]].
To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email:
[[email protected]]
