[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901323#comment-15901323
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARIA-105:
-------------------------------------
Github user ran-z commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca/pull/72#discussion_r104925924
--- Diff: aria/orchestrator/workflows/api/task.py ---
@@ -69,21 +73,38 @@ def __init__(self,
ignore_failure=None,
inputs=None,
plugin=None,
- runs_on=None):
+ runs_on=None,
+ dry=False):
"""
Creates an operation task using the name, details, node instance
and any additional kwargs.
- :param name: the operation of the name.
+
+ :param name: the name of the operation.
:param actor: the operation host on which this operation is
registered.
:param inputs: operation inputs.
"""
- assert isinstance(actor, (model.Node,
- model.Relationship))
+
+ assert isinstance(actor, (models.Node, models.Relationship))
super(OperationTask, self).__init__()
+
+ if dry:
+ from ..dry import convert_to_dry
+ plugin, implementation, inputs = convert_to_dry(plugin,
implementation, inputs)
+
+ # Coerce inputs
+ if inputs is None:
+ inputs = {}
+ else:
+ for k, v in inputs.iteritems():
+ if not isinstance(v, models.Parameter):
+ inputs[k] = models.Parameter(name=k,
+
type_name=full_type_name(v),
--- End diff --
the type here should in principle correspond to the one in template's
operation's inputs, correct? i understand theres no validation on this at the
moment but im asking whether theres any benefit to saving the type name of an
arbitrary input
> Integrate new models into parser
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: ARIA-105
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-105
> Project: AriaTosca
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Ran Ziv
> Assignee: Tal Liron
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
