[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901368#comment-15901368
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARIA-105:
-------------------------------------
Github user ran-z commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca/pull/72#discussion_r104932469
--- Diff: aria/cli/commands.py ---
@@ -230,43 +228,48 @@ def _parse(self, uri):
def _get_workflow(self, context, workflow_name):
if workflow_name in BUILTIN_WORKFLOWS:
- workflow_fn =
import_fullname('aria.orchestrator.workflows.builtin.%s' % workflow_name)
+ workflow_fn =
import_fullname('aria.orchestrator.workflows.builtin.{0}'.format(
+ workflow_name))
inputs = {}
else:
+ workflow = None
+ for policy in context.modeling.instance.policies:
--- End diff --
if by now there should be a service in the storage, shouldn't this access
be to the service's "operations" field instead?
> Integrate new models into parser
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: ARIA-105
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-105
> Project: AriaTosca
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Ran Ziv
> Assignee: Tal Liron
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)