[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901368#comment-15901368
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARIA-105:
-------------------------------------

Github user ran-z commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca/pull/72#discussion_r104932469
  
    --- Diff: aria/cli/commands.py ---
    @@ -230,43 +228,48 @@ def _parse(self, uri):
         
         def _get_workflow(self, context, workflow_name):
             if workflow_name in BUILTIN_WORKFLOWS:
    -            workflow_fn = 
import_fullname('aria.orchestrator.workflows.builtin.%s' % workflow_name)
    +            workflow_fn = 
import_fullname('aria.orchestrator.workflows.builtin.{0}'.format(
    +                workflow_name))
                 inputs = {}
             else:
    +            workflow = None
    +            for policy in context.modeling.instance.policies:
    --- End diff --
    
    if by now there should be a service in the storage, shouldn't this access 
be to the service's "operations" field instead?


> Integrate new models into parser
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARIA-105
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-105
>             Project: AriaTosca
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Ran Ziv
>            Assignee: Tal Liron
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to