[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15957095#comment-15957095
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARIA-134:
-------------------------------------
Github user tliron commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca/pull/91#discussion_r109956081
--- Diff: extensions/aria_extension_tosca/simple_v1_0/modeling/__init__.py
---
@@ -446,6 +451,29 @@ def get(name):
return model
+def create_workflow_operation_template_model(context, service_template,
policy):
+ model = OperationTemplate(name=policy._name,
--- End diff --
You are not wrong ... but I also wanted to minimize the number of models we
have. I think if we do decide to change this, we can do it in a separate JIRA.
> Service.workflows field is not populated
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARIA-134
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-134
> Project: AriaTosca
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ran Ziv
> Assignee: Tal Liron
>
> Service.workflows field is not populated
> It should be populated with policies whose role is set to Workflow
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
