[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15957096#comment-15957096
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARIA-134:
-------------------------------------
Github user tliron commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca/pull/91#discussion_r109956337
--- Diff: extensions/aria_extension_tosca/simple_v1_0/modeling/__init__.py
---
@@ -85,9 +85,14 @@ def create_service_template_model(context): # pylint:
disable=too-many-locals,to
policies = context.presentation.get('service_template',
'topology_template', 'policies')
if policies:
for policy in policies.itervalues():
- if model.policy_types.get_descendant(policy.type).role ==
'plugin':
+ role = model.policy_types.get_descendant(policy.type).role
--- End diff --
*All* the policies are added in line 115, below. Well, I think we *have* to
add all of them because they are there in the TOSCA service template. The fact
that ARIA recognizes some special roles doesn't mean they aren't policies,
still.
> Service.workflows field is not populated
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARIA-134
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-134
> Project: AriaTosca
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ran Ziv
> Assignee: Tal Liron
>
> Service.workflows field is not populated
> It should be populated with policies whose role is set to Workflow
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
