Yeah, i have no problem with your proposed changed, but I just want to understand the underlying problem.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:10, David Bosschaert <[email protected]>wrote: > On 2 March 2012 11:03, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > > But why deploying aries jndi in that case ? > > Because it provides JNDI integration with the OSGi Service Registry. > > > I think if that's a valid use case, we should also handle the problem in > a > > nicer way using a property on the bundle context or system property to > > disable the registration. > > It would be a possibility, but I think it's unnecessary extra > configuration to be honest. The system works fine as it is today, I > only really want to move the logging of the exception down to the > debug level... > > Best, regards, > > David > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ FuseSource, Integration everywhere http://fusesource.com
