I've made this change in r1296991. Hope that works for everyone. Best regards,
David On 2 March 2012 11:13, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, i have no problem with your proposed changed, but I just want to > understand the underlying problem. > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:10, David Bosschaert > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 2 March 2012 11:03, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >> > But why deploying aries jndi in that case ? >> >> Because it provides JNDI integration with the OSGi Service Registry. >> >> > I think if that's a valid use case, we should also handle the problem in >> a >> > nicer way using a property on the bundle context or system property to >> > disable the registration. >> >> It would be a possibility, but I think it's unnecessary extra >> configuration to be honest. The system works fine as it is today, I >> only really want to move the logging of the exception down to the >> debug level... >> >> Best, regards, >> >> David >> > > > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > FuseSource, Integration everywhere > http://fusesource.com
