Looks like David and I managed to sort this out.   I'll proceed with the JMX 
stuff.

Dan



On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Ah…  there are some incompatible changes in org.apache.aries.jmx.codec that 
>> the version checker is flagging causing it to force it up to 2.0.    I'll 
>> see if I can make that package compatible enough to keep it 1.1.0.
> 
> OK.   I added back in some constructors which is allowing it to drop to 
> 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.  
> 
> David:  can you double check to make sure that change is OK?     Also, should 
> I mark those constructors @Deprecated or not?
> 
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:16 AM, David Bosschaert <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I would have thought that it should be version 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. That's what
>>> I used when I committed the file from jmx-next.
>>> 
>>> However I see that the version has been bumped to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT by Emily
>>> in revision 1424200:
>>> Revision: 1424200
>>> Author: ejiang
>>> Date: 19 December 2012 22:57:24
>>> Message:
>>> ARIES-979: Integrate semantic versioning maven plugin in aries modules
>>> (jmx)
>>> 
>>> Maybe Emily has an idea why it got bumped, but if you ask me it should be
>>> 1.1...
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> David
>>> 
>>> On 23 January 2013 15:56, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> David,
>>>> 
>>>> I just noticed that jmx-api is now at version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT, yet it says
>>>> it implements the 1.1 API?   Is the version number there correct?   Kind of
>>>> concerned about that version number as it would be outside the normal
>>>> import range for existing bundles (likely [1.0,2) ).
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Dan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin.  Things look
>>>> OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow.   Talking
>>>> to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, it looks
>>>> like I'll need:
>>>>> 
>>>>> util-r2
>>>>> util
>>>>> proxy-impl
>>>>> proxy-bundle
>>>>> blueprint-core
>>>>> blueprint-cm
>>>>> blueprint-bundle
>>>>> jmx-api
>>>>> jmx-core
>>>>> jmx-blueprint-core
>>>>> jmx-bundle
>>>>> jmx-blueprint-bundle
>>>>> transaction-blueprint
>>>>> jpa-blueprint-aries
>>>>> blueprint-itests
>>>>> blueprint-testbundleb
>>>>> 
>>>>> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all
>>>> tomorrow.   If you have any additional updates or changes, please speak up
>>>> now.  Thanks!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Daniel Kulp
>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Kulp
> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> 

-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to