Saw your email later. Glad you have sorted out. In the future, it will be the developer who check in changes and then maintain the versions, so she/he can decide what to do when there is a need to bump up the major version. Thanks Emily
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Looks like David and I managed to sort this out. I'll proceed with the > JMX stuff. > > Dan > > > > On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Ah… there are some incompatible changes in org.apache.aries.jmx.codec > that the version checker is flagging causing it to force it up to 2.0. > I'll see if I can make that package compatible enough to keep it 1.1.0. > > > > OK. I added back in some constructors which is allowing it to drop to > 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. > > > > David: can you double check to make sure that change is OK? Also, > should I mark those constructors @Deprecated or not? > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:16 AM, David Bosschaert < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> I would have thought that it should be version 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. That's > what > >>> I used when I committed the file from jmx-next. > >>> > >>> However I see that the version has been bumped to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT by > Emily > >>> in revision 1424200: > >>> Revision: 1424200 > >>> Author: ejiang > >>> Date: 19 December 2012 22:57:24 > >>> Message: > >>> ARIES-979: Integrate semantic versioning maven plugin in aries modules > >>> (jmx) > >>> > >>> Maybe Emily has an idea why it got bumped, but if you ask me it should > be > >>> 1.1... > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> David > >>> > >>> On 23 January 2013 15:56, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> David, > >>>> > >>>> I just noticed that jmx-api is now at version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT, yet it > says > >>>> it implements the 1.1 API? Is the version number there correct? > Kind of > >>>> concerned about that version number as it would be outside the normal > >>>> import range for existing bundles (likely [1.0,2) ). > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Dan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things > look > >>>> OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow. > Talking > >>>> to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, it > looks > >>>> like I'll need: > >>>>> > >>>>> util-r2 > >>>>> util > >>>>> proxy-impl > >>>>> proxy-bundle > >>>>> blueprint-core > >>>>> blueprint-cm > >>>>> blueprint-bundle > >>>>> jmx-api > >>>>> jmx-core > >>>>> jmx-blueprint-core > >>>>> jmx-bundle > >>>>> jmx-blueprint-bundle > >>>>> transaction-blueprint > >>>>> jpa-blueprint-aries > >>>>> blueprint-itests > >>>>> blueprint-testbundleb > >>>>> > >>>>> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all > >>>> tomorrow. If you have any additional updates or changes, please > speak up > >>>> now. Thanks! > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Daniel Kulp > >>>>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Daniel Kulp > >>>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > >>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> -- > >> Daniel Kulp > >> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >> > > > > -- > > Daniel Kulp > > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > > -- Thanks Emily ================= Emily Jiang [email protected]
