I've been having publish problems. I created a page to document the esa-maven-plugin [1] and updated the menu to link it in. I've published it on numerous occasions and sometimes it's appeared on the public site and others it's gone. Any thoughts?
[1] http://aries.staging.apache.org/modules/esamavenpluginproject.html On 10 July 2013 22:45, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > OK forget that. Either my browser was playing up or the publish I just > did for the July board report kicked it all into action. > > On 10 July 2013 22:38, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi David, I was looking at the Aries home page and thought 'hang on > > didn't David update this to refer to R5 a while back'. I can see your > > changes on aries.staging.apache.org but not yet on aries.apache.org. > > Did you hit th publish link? I ask this, because I have had problems > > with the 'overview' directory recently and updates not getting > > published properly. > > > > Cheers, > > Jeremy > > > > On 5 June 2013 11:10, David Bosschaert <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I've made the changes as agreed. I didn't touch the release pages. > Removed > >> the javadoc, release notes pages and pointer to inactive Aries blog. > >> I've also updated the 'programming model' page to be a more > comprehensive > >> (but high-level) list of technologies available in Aries: > >> http://aries.apache.org/documentation/ariesprogrammingmodel.html > >> > >> Anyone: feel free to make additional changes... > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> David > >> > >> On 4 June 2013 13:53, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi David, > >>> > >>> I made some comments and votes largely in line with what's been > >>> discussed... > >>> > >>> On 4 June 2013 12:24, David Bosschaert <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > On 28 May 2013 14:43, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> > >>> >> On May 27, 2013, at 10:18 AM, David Bosschaert < > >>> [email protected]> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > Downloads > >>> >> > * This page was last updated for the 1.0.0 release train and I > wonder > >>> >> > whether we need it. All this info is available in Maven Central, > can > >>> we > >>> >> not > >>> >> > simply remove it? > >>> >> > * Release notes. Since we are now supporting modular releases, do > >>> central > >>> >> > release notes make sense? I would simply remove this page. > >>> >> > * Archived releases - again, can we simply leverage Maven central > for > >>> >> this? > >>> >> > >>> >> No for 1 and 3. Per Apache policy, the releases must be > downloadable > >>> from > >>> >> the Apache mirror network and old releases available from > >>> >> archive.apache.org/dist. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > I didn't hear any objections to the other suggestions I made. If > nobody > >>> > shouts soon I'll make the changes I outlined in my original email > (pasted > >>> > below for reference) with the exception of the items pointed out by > Dan > >>> > above. > >>> > > >>> > Again - we can always add any of these pages back later if we want. I > >>> just > >>> > want to get rid of as much stuff that is blatantly out of date... > >>> > > >>> > Cheers, > >>> > > >>> > David > >>> > > >>> > ---- > >>> > Original mail: > >>> > > >>> > Hi all, > >>> > > >>> > I had a quick browse through the Aries website and noticed that > there are > >>> > quite a number of outdated pages. In some cases it was easy to > update the > >>> > pages to more recent info (e.g. for the latest OSGi specs) but in > other > >>> > cases I would propose the simply remove the outdated information. If > >>> > someone has the time to provide a replacement this can then be done > >>> later. > >>> > > >>> > Here's what I found: > >>> > > >>> > Documentation > >>> > * Programming Model: The Application model has since been superseded > by > >>> the > >>> > standardised Subsystems. Proposal: remove Application bullets. > >>> > >>> +0. Would be good to keep it there but in a 'superceded' section. > >>> > >>> > * Pointers to OSGi specs: I updated these to point to R5 (was 4.2). > >>> > >>> +1 to keeping this up to date. > >>> > >>> > * Javadoc: this incomplete lists of modules points at old versions > >>> (0.3). I > >>> > would propose to delete this page as this info is available in the > >>> > published javadoc maven artefacts. > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> > > >>> > Downloads > >>> > * This page was last updated for the 1.0.0 release train and I wonder > >>> > whether we need it. All this info is available in Maven Central, can > we > >>> not > >>> > simply remove it? > >>> > >>> -1 Like Dan says, our releases must be available from > >>> www.apache.org/dist and having a list of the releases is the best way > >>> of getting to them. > >>> > >>> > * Release notes. Since we are now supporting modular releases, do > central > >>> > release notes make sense? I would simply remove this page. > >>> > >>> +1. Each release should get a set of release notes in JIRA. It would > >>> be nice to have this linked from the main downloads page. > >>> > >>> > * Archived releases - again, can we simply leverage Maven central for > >>> this? > >>> > >>> -1 Like Dan say. > >>> > >>> > > >>> > Community > >>> > * Aries group blog - hasn't been active since 2010. Should we remove > this > >>> > link from the menu? > >>> > >>> +0 > >>> > >>> > > >>> > I don't really have the time to completely polish up the website but > I > >>> > would be happy to make the above changes to ensure that the obsolete > info > >>> > is gone. > >>> > > >>> > Thoughts anyone? > >>> > Cheers, > >>> > > >>> > David > >>> >
