Oooh, I take that back.... :) http://aries.apache.org/modules/esamavenpluginproject.html
On 2 August 2013 09:41, Graham Charters <[email protected]> wrote: > As I suspected, still no sign of my docs :( > > > On 1 August 2013 17:04, David Bosschaert <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Yep I (and others) had that too. I think it's probably an intermediate >> proxy problem. >> Try to view your page again tomorrow, it might be ok then... >> >> This should really be properly fixed though... >> >> >> On 1 August 2013 16:56, Graham Charters <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I've been having publish problems. I created a page to document the >> > esa-maven-plugin [1] and updated the menu to link it in. I've >> published it >> > on numerous occasions and sometimes it's appeared on the public site and >> > others it's gone. Any thoughts? >> > >> > [1] http://aries.staging.apache.org/modules/esamavenpluginproject.html >> > >> > >> > On 10 July 2013 22:45, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > OK forget that. Either my browser was playing up or the publish I just >> > > did for the July board report kicked it all into action. >> > > >> > > On 10 July 2013 22:38, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > Hi David, I was looking at the Aries home page and thought 'hang on >> > > > didn't David update this to refer to R5 a while back'. I can see >> your >> > > > changes on aries.staging.apache.org but not yet on aries.apache.org >> . >> > > > Did you hit th publish link? I ask this, because I have had problems >> > > > with the 'overview' directory recently and updates not getting >> > > > published properly. >> > > > >> > > > Cheers, >> > > > Jeremy >> > > > >> > > > On 5 June 2013 11:10, David Bosschaert <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> I've made the changes as agreed. I didn't touch the release pages. >> > > Removed >> > > >> the javadoc, release notes pages and pointer to inactive Aries >> blog. >> > > >> I've also updated the 'programming model' page to be a more >> > > comprehensive >> > > >> (but high-level) list of technologies available in Aries: >> > > >> http://aries.apache.org/documentation/ariesprogrammingmodel.html >> > > >> >> > > >> Anyone: feel free to make additional changes... >> > > >> >> > > >> Cheers, >> > > >> >> > > >> David >> > > >> >> > > >> On 4 June 2013 13:53, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >>> Hi David, >> > > >>> >> > > >>> I made some comments and votes largely in line with what's been >> > > >>> discussed... >> > > >>> >> > > >>> On 4 June 2013 12:24, David Bosschaert < >> [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >>> > On 28 May 2013 14:43, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> On May 27, 2013, at 10:18 AM, David Bosschaert < >> > > >>> [email protected]> >> > > >>> >> wrote: >> > > >>> >> > Downloads >> > > >>> >> > * This page was last updated for the 1.0.0 release train and >> I >> > > wonder >> > > >>> >> > whether we need it. All this info is available in Maven >> Central, >> > > can >> > > >>> we >> > > >>> >> not >> > > >>> >> > simply remove it? >> > > >>> >> > * Release notes. Since we are now supporting modular >> releases, >> > do >> > > >>> central >> > > >>> >> > release notes make sense? I would simply remove this page. >> > > >>> >> > * Archived releases - again, can we simply leverage Maven >> > central >> > > for >> > > >>> >> this? >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> No for 1 and 3. Per Apache policy, the releases must be >> > > downloadable >> > > >>> from >> > > >>> >> the Apache mirror network and old releases available from >> > > >>> >> archive.apache.org/dist. >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> > I didn't hear any objections to the other suggestions I made. If >> > > nobody >> > > >>> > shouts soon I'll make the changes I outlined in my original >> email >> > > (pasted >> > > >>> > below for reference) with the exception of the items pointed >> out by >> > > Dan >> > > >>> > above. >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > Again - we can always add any of these pages back later if we >> > want. I >> > > >>> just >> > > >>> > want to get rid of as much stuff that is blatantly out of >> date... >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > Cheers, >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > David >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > ---- >> > > >>> > Original mail: >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > Hi all, >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > I had a quick browse through the Aries website and noticed that >> > > there are >> > > >>> > quite a number of outdated pages. In some cases it was easy to >> > > update the >> > > >>> > pages to more recent info (e.g. for the latest OSGi specs) but >> in >> > > other >> > > >>> > cases I would propose the simply remove the outdated >> information. >> > If >> > > >>> > someone has the time to provide a replacement this can then be >> done >> > > >>> later. >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > Here's what I found: >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > Documentation >> > > >>> > * Programming Model: The Application model has since been >> > superseded >> > > by >> > > >>> the >> > > >>> > standardised Subsystems. Proposal: remove Application bullets. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> +0. Would be good to keep it there but in a 'superceded' section. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> > * Pointers to OSGi specs: I updated these to point to R5 (was >> 4.2). >> > > >>> >> > > >>> +1 to keeping this up to date. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> > * Javadoc: this incomplete lists of modules points at old >> versions >> > > >>> (0.3). I >> > > >>> > would propose to delete this page as this info is available in >> the >> > > >>> > published javadoc maven artefacts. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> +1 >> > > >>> >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > Downloads >> > > >>> > * This page was last updated for the 1.0.0 release train and I >> > wonder >> > > >>> > whether we need it. All this info is available in Maven Central, >> > can >> > > we >> > > >>> not >> > > >>> > simply remove it? >> > > >>> >> > > >>> -1 Like Dan says, our releases must be available from >> > > >>> www.apache.org/dist and having a list of the releases is the best >> > way >> > > >>> of getting to them. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> > * Release notes. Since we are now supporting modular releases, >> do >> > > central >> > > >>> > release notes make sense? I would simply remove this page. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> +1. Each release should get a set of release notes in JIRA. It >> would >> > > >>> be nice to have this linked from the main downloads page. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> > * Archived releases - again, can we simply leverage Maven >> central >> > for >> > > >>> this? >> > > >>> >> > > >>> -1 Like Dan say. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > Community >> > > >>> > * Aries group blog - hasn't been active since 2010. Should we >> > remove >> > > this >> > > >>> > link from the menu? >> > > >>> >> > > >>> +0 >> > > >>> >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > I don't really have the time to completely polish up the website >> > but >> > > I >> > > >>> > would be happy to make the above changes to ensure that the >> > obsolete >> > > info >> > > >>> > is gone. >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > Thoughts anyone? >> > > >>> > Cheers, >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > David >> > > >>> >> > > >> > >> > >
