Great :) I've created a first one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1149
If this goes well, I'll tackle the other one :) Regards Carsten 2014/1/17 David Bosschaert <[email protected]> > Hi Carsten, > > I think that makes sense. Whether you use Blueprint, DS, OSGi/CDI or > whatever else as a component framework is a little bit a matter of > taste. I agree that it would be good to decouple the subsystems > implementation from the component framework so that people can make > that choice independently... > > I'm sure that if you provide patches they will be looked at :) > > Cheers, > > David > > On 17 January 2014 16:39, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > we would like to run the subsystems implementation without Blueprint. > It's > > not a matter whether Blueprint is good or not and I don't want to start a > > thread about that :). The main reason are a) we want to have Subsystems > > running as soon as possible and with as less dependencies as possible b) > we > > can't ship Blueprint with our products (and again this decision is not > > caused by technical reasons) > > > > Now if I look correctly, the only bundles requiring Blueprint are the > > application.utils and application.modeller. Naive looking it should be > > straight forward to migrate these to use an Activator and register the > > services by hand. > > > > My question is now, if I would provide the patches, is there interest in > > applying them? > > > > Regards > > Carsten > > -- > > Carsten Ziegeler > > [email protected] > -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
