Hi John, yes, exactly that's what I'm thinking of - sorry for not being clear.
Regards Carsten 2014/1/20 John W Ross <[email protected]> > > Hi Carsten, > > I'm not sure what you're suggesting. My understanding was you wanted to do > some stuff to remove the dependency on Aries Blueprint. My response was > that this should have already been done by the referenced defect. Removing > Aries Blueprint, however it's done, will result in the loss of service > dependency validation. The only way around that in the pre-R6 > implementation would be to provide a non-aries-blueprint-based > implementation of the ModelledResourceManager. Is that the work you're > volunteering to do? > > John > > > > > Re: Running Subsystems without Blueprint? > > > > Thanks for the pointer John, I didn't know that (was only using released > > stuff). > > > > However :) it seems that without Blueprint the features are rather > limited > > and of course everyone wants all features - so I think this still makes > > sense. Or are there any downsides especially given the fact that someone > (= > > me) is volunteering to do the work? > > > > Regards > > Carsten > > > > > > 2014/1/17 John W Ross <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The dependency has already been broken in trunk [1]. Is that not > > > sufficient? Also, beware the service dependency limitations this > introduces > > > as discussed in the referenced defect. These will, of course, be > mitigated > > > somewhat in OSGi RFC 201 for R6 with support for the osgi.service > namespace > > > in Require/Provide-Capability. > > > > > > John > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-952? > > > > focusedCommentId=13703354&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- > > > tabpanel#comment-13703354 > > > > > > > > > > > Running Subsystems without Blueprint? > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > we would like to run the subsystems implementation without Blueprint. > > > It's > > > > not a matter whether Blueprint is good or not and I don't want to > start a > > > > thread about that :). The main reason are a) we want to have > Subsystems > > > > running as soon as possible and with as less dependencies as possible > b) > > > we > > > > can't ship Blueprint with our products (and again this decision is > not > > > > caused by technical reasons) > > > > > > > > Now if I look correctly, the only bundles requiring Blueprint are the > > > > application.utils and application.modeller. Naive looking it should > be > > > > straight forward to migrate these to use an Activator and register > the > > > > services by hand. > > > > > > > > My question is now, if I would provide the patches, is there interest > in > > > > applying them? > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Carsten > > > > -- > > > > Carsten Ziegeler > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carsten Ziegeler > > [email protected] > -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
