Thanks ! It helps !

Let me do a pass then :)

Regards
JB

On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 11:28 AM Dominik Przybysz <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello,
> it sounds like a good plan then :)
>
> I extracted the current state so we can by the way what we would like to
> still support
>
> Domain                      │ Source │ CI Testing        │ Multi-Version
> ────────────────────────────┼────────┼───────────────────┼───────────────
> async                       │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> blueprint                   │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> blueprint-maven-plugin      │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> esa-ant-task                │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> esa-maven-plugin            │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> jmx                         │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> jndi                        │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> proxy                       │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> pushstream                  │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> quiesce                     │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> samples                     │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> spi-fly                     │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> subsystem                   │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> testsupport                 │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> transaction                 │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> tutorials                   │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> util                        │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> versioning                  │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> web                         │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
>
>
>
> Pozdrawiam/Regards,
> Dominik Przybysz
>
> sob., 24 sty 2026, 09:47 użytkownik Christian Schneider <
> [email protected]> napisał:
>
>> I think when we have to decide between Java 8 and 11 then I would opt for
>> 11 as the
>> safe choice.
>>
>> I agree with JB that java 11 now and 17 after the releases would be a good
>> choice.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 at 17:38, Dominik Przybysz <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi JBO,
>> > it's great to hear :)
>> >
>> > You raised a question about minimal Java version supported in
>> > https://github.com/apache/aries/pull/414#issuecomment-3721877884.
>> >
>> > I thought that since Java 8 is still supported it would be right
>> version,
>> > but there are less and less libraries supporting it. I feel we should
>> > together decide about the minimal version of Java we want to have in
>> Aries.
>> >
>> > Maybe we would like to declare some policy about supported versions e.g.
>> > that we support 2 or 3 last LTS versions of Java?
>> > Current bnd supports java 17 as the mininal version. On the other hand I
>> > see that Apache Karaf is still supporting java 11+
>> > https://karaf.apache.org/download.html.
>> >
>> > WDYT?
>> >
>> > czw., 8 sty 2026 o 06:01 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>> > napisał(a):
>> >
>> > > Hi everyone,
>> > >
>> > > I apologize for the delay in my response. I am back to working on
>> Aries
>> > and
>> > > will now review the CI and dependencies in preparation for the new
>> > > releases.
>> > >
>> > > I look forward to collaborating with you all, particularly Dominik, on
>> > > this.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > JB
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 6:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi everyone,
>> > > >
>> > > > I would like to propose a new set of Aries releases (proxy,
>> blueprint,
>> > > > etc).
>> > > >
>> > > > I have some fixes on the way, and I can start the preparation.
>> > > >
>> > > > Any objections?
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards
>> > > > JB
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> > Dominik Przybysz
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>>
>> Computer Scientist
>> http://www.adobe.com
>>
>

Reply via email to