Hi Dominik Yup, we are on the same page here.
I plan to check and start later today and during the weekend. Regards JB On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 7:11 PM Dominik Przybysz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > if we are looking at the top level domains than I think you can add > versioning to the initial list with util and proxy (in the future we can > think about replacing whole versioining with bnd baseline). > > Blueprint has some tests with quiesce and it should be also ready for > release together. > > Later JMX and blueprint plugin. > > Next big modules to release could be jndi, subsystem, web. > > In the end there are also independent: async, spi-fly, transaction > > Pushstream seems to be only a prototype and could be dropped? > > Are you going to make a full code review of all the changes in the modules > before release? In case we can handle some verification in automatic tests > it would be the best solution. > > If you need any help in releasing then please let me know. > > śr., 4 lut 2026 o 11:18 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> napisał(a): > > > Hi Dominik > > > > I don't want to release everything in one round, because it's pretty hard > > to review. > > > > I was more thinking about starting with util/proxy and then blueprint, > and > > then jmx, etc. > > > > Wdyt ? > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 5:39 PM Dominik Przybysz <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> I'm happy to hear that :) > >> > >> What order of releases are you planning? Are you going to release > >> everything right now as the last artifacts supporting java 8? > >> > >> Meantime I started preparing blueprint for Java > 8 in > >> https://github.com/apache/aries/pull/785 > >> Current status is: > >> - for java >= 11 Spring and SpringExtender itests fails - problem with > >> classloader for namespaces > >> - for java >= 17 Quiesce itests fails - problem with namespaces > >> - for java >= 25 Authorization itests fails - problem with incompatible > >> java API (removed javax.security.auth.Subject.getSubject) > >> > >> niedz., 1 lut 2026 o 16:19 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > >> napisał(a): > >> > >>> Hi folks, > >>> > >>> I saw new updates from Dominik (thanks a lot !). I'm rebasing and doing > >>> the > >>> pass. I will start the round of release to vote asap. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >>> On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 11:48 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected] > > > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Thanks ! It helps ! > >>> > > >>> > Let me do a pass then :) > >>> > > >>> > Regards > >>> > JB > >>> > > >>> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 11:28 AM Dominik Przybysz < > >>> [email protected]> > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> Hello, > >>> >> it sounds like a good plan then :) > >>> >> > >>> >> I extracted the current state so we can by the way what we would > like > >>> to > >>> >> still support > >>> >> > >>> >> Domain │ Source │ CI Testing │ > >>> Multi-Version > >>> >> > >>> > ────────────────────────────┼────────┼───────────────────┼─────────────── > >>> >> async │ 8 │ 8 │ NO > >>> >> blueprint │ 8 │ 8 │ NO > >>> >> blueprint-maven-plugin │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ > >>> >> esa-ant-task │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ > >>> >> esa-maven-plugin │ 8 │ 8 │ NO > >>> >> jmx │ 8 │ 8 │ NO > >>> >> jndi │ 8 │ 8 │ NO > >>> >> proxy │ 8 │ 8 │ NO > >>> >> pushstream │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ > >>> >> quiesce │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ > >>> >> samples │ 8 │ 8 │ NO > >>> >> spi-fly │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ > >>> >> subsystem │ 8 │ 8 │ NO > >>> >> testsupport │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ > >>> >> transaction │ 8 │ 8 │ NO > >>> >> tutorials │ 8 │ 8 │ NO > >>> >> util │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ > >>> >> versioning │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ > >>> >> web │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> Pozdrawiam/Regards, > >>> >> Dominik Przybysz > >>> >> > >>> >> sob., 24 sty 2026, 09:47 użytkownik Christian Schneider < > >>> >> [email protected]> napisał: > >>> >> > >>> >>> I think when we have to decide between Java 8 and 11 then I would > >>> opt for > >>> >>> 11 as the > >>> >>> safe choice. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> I agree with JB that java 11 now and 17 after the releases would > be a > >>> >>> good > >>> >>> choice. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Christian > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 at 17:38, Dominik Przybysz < > [email protected] > >>> > > >>> >>> wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Hi JBO, > >>> >>> > it's great to hear :) > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > You raised a question about minimal Java version supported in > >>> >>> > https://github.com/apache/aries/pull/414#issuecomment-3721877884 > . > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > I thought that since Java 8 is still supported it would be right > >>> >>> version, > >>> >>> > but there are less and less libraries supporting it. I feel we > >>> should > >>> >>> > together decide about the minimal version of Java we want to have > >>> in > >>> >>> Aries. > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > Maybe we would like to declare some policy about supported > versions > >>> >>> e.g. > >>> >>> > that we support 2 or 3 last LTS versions of Java? > >>> >>> > Current bnd supports java 17 as the mininal version. On the other > >>> hand > >>> >>> I > >>> >>> > see that Apache Karaf is still supporting java 11+ > >>> >>> > https://karaf.apache.org/download.html. > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > WDYT? > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > czw., 8 sty 2026 o 06:01 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > >>> >>> > napisał(a): > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > Hi everyone, > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > I apologize for the delay in my response. I am back to working > on > >>> >>> Aries > >>> >>> > and > >>> >>> > > will now review the CI and dependencies in preparation for the > >>> new > >>> >>> > > releases. > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > I look forward to collaborating with you all, particularly > >>> Dominik, > >>> >>> on > >>> >>> > > this. > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > Regards, > >>> >>> > > JB > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 6:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > >>> >>> [email protected]> > >>> >>> > > wrote: > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > Hi everyone, > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > I would like to propose a new set of Aries releases (proxy, > >>> >>> blueprint, > >>> >>> > > > etc). > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > I have some fixes on the way, and I can start the > preparation. > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > Any objections? > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > Regards > >>> >>> > > > JB > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > -- > >>> >>> > Regards, > >>> >>> > Dominik Przybysz > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> -- > >>> >>> -- > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Computer Scientist > >>> >>> http://www.adobe.com > >>> >>> > >>> >> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Dominik Przybysz > >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Dominik Przybysz >
