Hi Jacob, Thanks for helping this!
I'm filling IP clearance form: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.xml (I think that we can see it at https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.html soon.) Could you stop merging any pull requests until this IP clearance is finished? (I think that it's acceptable because the last commit of https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl is 2021-11-02.) Here are TODO items: 1. Check that all active committers have a signed CLA on record. 2. Remind active committers that they are responsible for ensuring that a Corporate CLA is recorded if such is required to authorize their contributions under their individual CLA. I think that people who commit after https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library.html (8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134) are target: $ git shortlog -sn 8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134..1447cb2b13b728729f9a89760ac07a848e31e599 53 Jacob Quinn 16 Jarrett Revels 10 Curtis Vogt 8 Eric Hanson 2 Douglas Bates 2 ExpandingMan 2 Kristoffer Carlsson 1 Damien Drix 1 Denis Barucic 1 Jon Alm Eriksen 1 KronosTheLate 1 Nick Robinson 1 Pietro Vertechi 1 Simeon Schaub 1 Tanmay Mohapatra 1 Étienne Tétreault-Pinard According to the discussion in Ballista's IP clearance process, https://lists.apache.org/thread/k0k7x3rrg56nk8s2c1tvrrv76zl2b1m4 we can remove people who has only 1 commit from the target list: 53 Jacob Quinn 16 Jarrett Revels 10 Curtis Vogt 8 Eric Hanson 2 Douglas Bates 2 ExpandingMan 2 Kristoffer Carlsson And we can also remove people who commit before (including) 8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134 because they signed CLA in the previous IP clearance: $ git shortlog -sn 16b729db74d78ecb010efab855c9e46c8052f59e..8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134 | cat 103 ExpandingMan 53 Jacob Quinn 4 David Anthoff 2 Jacob Adenbaum 2 Spencer Lyon 1 Graham Stark 1 John Myles White 1 Michael Savastio 1 TheCedarPrince So here is the target list: 16 Jarrett Revels 10 Curtis Vogt 8 Eric Hanson 2 Douglas Bates 2 Kristoffer Carlsson Jacob, could you ask them to sign CLA for the TODO item 1.? FYI: Ballista used a GitHub issue for this: https://github.com/ballista-compute/ballista/issues/646#issuecomment-806820971 And could you also remind 53 Jacob Quinn 16 Jarrett Revels 10 Curtis Vogt 8 Eric Hanson 2 Douglas Bates 2 ExpandingMan 2 Kristoffer Carlsson that the TODO item 2.? Thanks, -- kou In <cakyxbqovfs4761drtjma9rx5qalikwh1r4zwpczetxpj0ab...@mail.gmail.com> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process" on Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:43:32 -0700, Jacob Quinn <quinn.jac...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks kou, > > I'm happy to help in any way I can. I think I know all the Arrow.jl > contributors personally, so I'm happy to reach out to them for whatever is > needed. > > -Jacob > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 1:04 AM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Sorry for not working on this. I asked this on >> gene...@incubator.apache.org [1] and got a reply that there >> is a project that use the GitHub's transfer repository >> feature [2]. >> >> Let's start IP clearance process against >> https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl and use the GitHub's >> transfer repository feature after the IP clearance is >> passed. >> >> Are there any people who help this process? I think that we >> need to fill IP clearance form based on >> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html >> . >> >> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nqbzkp4owt43l66283d55302mjrjkzf >> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/15fx1j0zdnwmxxr0zo1mjf34gjwkxxly >> >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> kou >> >> In <20211013.053514.2154036949522056512....@clear-code.com> >> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository >> and process" on Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:35:14 +0900 (JST), >> Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi Jacob, >> > >> > It's a good idea if we can do this. >> > >> > Does anyone know where we can ask this? >> > >> > gene...@incubator.apache.org ? >> > https://lists.apache.org/list.html?gene...@incubator.apache.org >> > >> > INFRA JIRA? >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA >> > >> > Or ...? >> > >> > >> > It seems that we can use existing GitHub repository's >> > codebase for IP clearance. Some items listed in >> > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ does so such as >> > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/daffodil-vscode-debugger >> > . >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > -- >> > kou >> > >> > In <cakyxbqpmgurh1jepw-qvzq3r_yjibjarmssek5dayft-vxn...@mail.gmail.com> >> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new >> repository and process" on Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:24:36 -0600, >> > Jacob Quinn <quinn.jac...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi kou, >> >> >> >> I'm looking into the next steps and wondering if it's possible to use >> the >> >> Github mechanism of "transferring a repository" ( >> >> >> https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/transferring-a-repository >> ), >> >> since that could simplify a lot of things. It would retain existing >> github >> >> actions CI and other repository settings, auto-generate a redirect from >> the >> >> existing JuliaData/Arrow.jl repo, and completely preserve the commit/git >> >> history already in place. >> >> >> >> Do we know if this is a possibility? I realize we'd need to do the IP >> >> clearance before transferring, which is fine; just wondering if we can >> >> leverage this functionality from github? >> >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 11:19 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi Jacob, >> >>> >> >>> Could you open a pull request to import >> >>> https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl on >> >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia like >> >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8547 ? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> -- >> >>> kou >> >>> >> >>> In <20211003.140948.2107475918212883624....@clear-code.com> >> >>> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new >> repository >> >>> and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 14:09:48 +0900 (JST), >> >>> Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > Hi, >> >>> > >> >>> >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >> >>> > >> >>> > I should have used git...@arrow.apache.org for this. I've >> >>> > fixed this by pushing .asf.yaml to apache/arrow-julia: >> >>> > >> >>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/.asf.yaml >> >>> > >> >>> > I needed to use >> >>> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/arrow-julia.git for the >> >>> > first push. I couldn't use >> >>> > g...@github.com:apache/arrow-julia.git . >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > Thanks, >> >>> > -- >> >>> > kou >> >>> > >> >>> > In <20211003.134022.661649063345488310....@clear-code.com> >> >>> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new >> >>> repository and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:40:22 +0900 (JST), >> >>> > Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> >> Hi, >> >>> >> >> >>> >> I've created apache/arrow-julia from >> >>> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html with: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> * PMC: arrow >> >>> >> * Repository name: julia >> >>> >> * Generated name: arrow-jlia.git >> >>> >> * Repository description: Apache Arrow Julia >> >>> >> * Commit notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >> >>> >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Thanks, >> >>> >> -- >> >>> >> kou >> >>> >> >> >>> >> In <20211003.132505.1038511014845186183....@clear-code.com> >> >>> >> "[RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new >> repository >> >>> and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:25:05 +0900 (JST), >> >>> >> Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Hi, >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> The vote carries with 8 +1 binding votes, 3 +1 non-binding >> >>> >>> votes and no -1 votes. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> I'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance >> >>> >>> process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow-julia. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks, >> >>> >>> -- >> >>> >>> kou >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> In <20210927.115838.1144168888636593478....@clear-code.com> >> >>> >>> "[VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and >> >>> process" on Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:58:38 +0900 (JST), >> >>> >>> Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Hi, >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in favor of >> >>> >>>> the Julia community moving the Julia implementation of >> >>> >>>> Apache Arrow out of apache/arrow into apache/arrow-julia. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> The Julia community uses a process like the Rust community >> >>> >>>> uses [1][2]. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Here is a summary of the process: >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> 1. Use GitHub instead of JIRA for issue management platform >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Note: Contributors will be required to write issues for >> >>> >>>> planned features and bug fixes so that we have >> >>> >>>> visibility and opportunities for collaboration before a >> >>> >>>> PR shows up. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> (This is for the Apache way.) >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> [1] >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> 2. Release on demand >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Like DataFusion. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Release for apache/arrow doesn't include the Julia >> >>> >>>> implementation. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> The Julia implementation uses separated version >> >>> >>>> scheme. (apache/arrow uses 6.0.0 as the next version >> >>> >>>> but the next Julia implementation release doesn't use >> >>> >>>> 6.0.0.) >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> [2] >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> We'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance >> >>> >>>> process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow after >> >>> >>>> the vote is passed. (We don't use julia/arrow/ in >> >>> >>>> apache/arrow.) >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> See also discussions about this: [3][4] >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Please vote whether to accept the proposal and allow the >> >>> >>>> Julia community to proceed with the work. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> [ ] +1 : Accept the proposal >> >>> >>>> [ ] 0 : No opinion >> >>> >>>> [ ] -1 : Reject proposal because... >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> [1] >> >>> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TyrUP8_UWXqk97a8Hvb1d0UYWigch0HAephIjW7soSI/edit >> >>> >>>> [2] >> >>> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/master/dev/release/README.md >> >>> >>>> [3] >> >>> >> https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r6d91286686d92837fbe21dd042801a57e3a7b00b5903ea90a754ac7b%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E >> >>> >>>> [4] >> >>> >> https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r0df7f44f7e1ed7f6e4352d34047d53076208aa78aad308e30b58f83a%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Thanks, >> >>> >>>> -- >> >>> >>>> kou >> >>> >>
