Hi, I share the current status.
We've finished CLA related tasks. See https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl/issues/265 fro details. I've filled all items in IP clearance form: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.html And I've started IP clearance vote on gene...@incubator.apache.org: https://lists.apache.org/thread/f9xck9j8qdrhvw363vjl6qkk2g8t4l6b I'll ask INFRA to transfer JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow-julia after the vote is passed. Thanks, -- kou In <CAKyXBQoFA5-47S=pp-afupmd8bbress3iwgl1subjklznpg...@mail.gmail.com> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process" on Mon, 6 Dec 2021 22:51:33 -0700, Jacob Quinn <quinn.jac...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks kou, > > I think I've got all the details summarized in [this issue]( > https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl/issues/265) where we'll track > progress on the required CLAs. I've also reached out to the > individuals directly about signing the CLAs. > > -Jacob > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:02 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jacob, >> >> Thanks for helping this! >> >> I'm filling IP clearance form: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.xml >> >> (I think that we can see it at >> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.html >> soon.) >> >> Could you stop merging any pull requests until this IP >> clearance is finished? (I think that it's acceptable because >> the last commit of https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl is >> 2021-11-02.) >> >> Here are TODO items: >> >> 1. Check that all active committers have a signed CLA on record. >> >> 2. Remind active committers that they are responsible for >> ensuring that a Corporate CLA is recorded if such is >> required to authorize their contributions under their >> individual CLA. >> >> I think that people who commit after >> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library.html >> (8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134) are target: >> >> $ git shortlog -sn >> 8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134..1447cb2b13b728729f9a89760ac07a848e31e599 >> 53 Jacob Quinn >> 16 Jarrett Revels >> 10 Curtis Vogt >> 8 Eric Hanson >> 2 Douglas Bates >> 2 ExpandingMan >> 2 Kristoffer Carlsson >> 1 Damien Drix >> 1 Denis Barucic >> 1 Jon Alm Eriksen >> 1 KronosTheLate >> 1 Nick Robinson >> 1 Pietro Vertechi >> 1 Simeon Schaub >> 1 Tanmay Mohapatra >> 1 Étienne Tétreault-Pinard >> >> According to the discussion in Ballista's IP clearance process, >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/k0k7x3rrg56nk8s2c1tvrrv76zl2b1m4 >> we can remove people who has only 1 commit from the target list: >> >> 53 Jacob Quinn >> 16 Jarrett Revels >> 10 Curtis Vogt >> 8 Eric Hanson >> 2 Douglas Bates >> 2 ExpandingMan >> 2 Kristoffer Carlsson >> >> And we can also remove people who commit before >> (including) 8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134 because >> they signed CLA in the previous IP clearance: >> >> $ git shortlog -sn >> 16b729db74d78ecb010efab855c9e46c8052f59e..8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134 >> | cat >> 103 ExpandingMan >> 53 Jacob Quinn >> 4 David Anthoff >> 2 Jacob Adenbaum >> 2 Spencer Lyon >> 1 Graham Stark >> 1 John Myles White >> 1 Michael Savastio >> 1 TheCedarPrince >> >> So here is the target list: >> >> 16 Jarrett Revels >> 10 Curtis Vogt >> 8 Eric Hanson >> 2 Douglas Bates >> 2 Kristoffer Carlsson >> >> Jacob, could you ask them to sign CLA for the TODO item 1.? >> FYI: Ballista used a GitHub issue for this: >> >> https://github.com/ballista-compute/ballista/issues/646#issuecomment-806820971 >> >> And could you also remind >> >> 53 Jacob Quinn >> 16 Jarrett Revels >> 10 Curtis Vogt >> 8 Eric Hanson >> 2 Douglas Bates >> 2 ExpandingMan >> 2 Kristoffer Carlsson >> >> that the TODO item 2.? >> >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> kou >> >> In <cakyxbqovfs4761drtjma9rx5qalikwh1r4zwpczetxpj0ab...@mail.gmail.com> >> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository >> and process" on Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:43:32 -0700, >> Jacob Quinn <quinn.jac...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Thanks kou, >> > >> > I'm happy to help in any way I can. I think I know all the Arrow.jl >> > contributors personally, so I'm happy to reach out to them for whatever >> is >> > needed. >> > >> > -Jacob >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 1:04 AM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Sorry for not working on this. I asked this on >> >> gene...@incubator.apache.org [1] and got a reply that there >> >> is a project that use the GitHub's transfer repository >> >> feature [2]. >> >> >> >> Let's start IP clearance process against >> >> https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl and use the GitHub's >> >> transfer repository feature after the IP clearance is >> >> passed. >> >> >> >> Are there any people who help this process? I think that we >> >> need to fill IP clearance form based on >> >> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html >> >> . >> >> >> >> >> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nqbzkp4owt43l66283d55302mjrjkzf >> >> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/15fx1j0zdnwmxxr0zo1mjf34gjwkxxly >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> >> kou >> >> >> >> In <20211013.053514.2154036949522056512....@clear-code.com> >> >> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new >> repository >> >> and process" on Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:35:14 +0900 (JST), >> >> Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Hi Jacob, >> >> > >> >> > It's a good idea if we can do this. >> >> > >> >> > Does anyone know where we can ask this? >> >> > >> >> > gene...@incubator.apache.org ? >> >> > https://lists.apache.org/list.html?gene...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > >> >> > INFRA JIRA? >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA >> >> > >> >> > Or ...? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > It seems that we can use existing GitHub repository's >> >> > codebase for IP clearance. Some items listed in >> >> > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ does so such as >> >> > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/daffodil-vscode-debugger >> >> > . >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > -- >> >> > kou >> >> > >> >> > In < >> cakyxbqpmgurh1jepw-qvzq3r_yjibjarmssek5dayft-vxn...@mail.gmail.com> >> >> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new >> >> repository and process" on Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:24:36 -0600, >> >> > Jacob Quinn <quinn.jac...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Hi kou, >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm looking into the next steps and wondering if it's possible to use >> >> the >> >> >> Github mechanism of "transferring a repository" ( >> >> >> >> >> >> https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/transferring-a-repository >> >> ), >> >> >> since that could simplify a lot of things. It would retain existing >> >> github >> >> >> actions CI and other repository settings, auto-generate a redirect >> from >> >> the >> >> >> existing JuliaData/Arrow.jl repo, and completely preserve the >> commit/git >> >> >> history already in place. >> >> >> >> >> >> Do we know if this is a possibility? I realize we'd need to do the IP >> >> >> clearance before transferring, which is fine; just wondering if we >> can >> >> >> leverage this functionality from github? >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 11:19 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hi Jacob, >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Could you open a pull request to import >> >> >>> https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl on >> >> >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia like >> >> >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8547 ? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Thanks, >> >> >>> -- >> >> >>> kou >> >> >>> >> >> >>> In <20211003.140948.2107475918212883624....@clear-code.com> >> >> >>> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new >> >> repository >> >> >>> and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 14:09:48 +0900 (JST), >> >> >>> Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > Hi, >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > I should have used git...@arrow.apache.org for this. I've >> >> >>> > fixed this by pushing .asf.yaml to apache/arrow-julia: >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/.asf.yaml >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > I needed to use >> >> >>> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/arrow-julia.git for the >> >> >>> > first push. I couldn't use >> >> >>> > g...@github.com:apache/arrow-julia.git . >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > Thanks, >> >> >>> > -- >> >> >>> > kou >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > In <20211003.134022.661649063345488310....@clear-code.com> >> >> >>> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new >> >> >>> repository and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:40:22 +0900 (JST), >> >> >>> > Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> Hi, >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> I've created apache/arrow-julia from >> >> >>> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html with: >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> * PMC: arrow >> >> >>> >> * Repository name: julia >> >> >>> >> * Generated name: arrow-jlia.git >> >> >>> >> * Repository description: Apache Arrow Julia >> >> >>> >> * Commit notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >> >> >>> >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> Thanks, >> >> >>> >> -- >> >> >>> >> kou >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> In <20211003.132505.1038511014845186183....@clear-code.com> >> >> >>> >> "[RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new >> >> repository >> >> >>> and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:25:05 +0900 (JST), >> >> >>> >> Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> Hi, >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> The vote carries with 8 +1 binding votes, 3 +1 non-binding >> >> >>> >>> votes and no -1 votes. >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> I'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance >> >> >>> >>> process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow-julia. >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Thanks, >> >> >>> >>> -- >> >> >>> >>> kou >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> In <20210927.115838.1144168888636593478....@clear-code.com> >> >> >>> >>> "[VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository >> and >> >> >>> process" on Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:58:38 +0900 (JST), >> >> >>> >>> Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> Hi, >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in favor of >> >> >>> >>>> the Julia community moving the Julia implementation of >> >> >>> >>>> Apache Arrow out of apache/arrow into apache/arrow-julia. >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> The Julia community uses a process like the Rust community >> >> >>> >>>> uses [1][2]. >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> Here is a summary of the process: >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> 1. Use GitHub instead of JIRA for issue management platform >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> Note: Contributors will be required to write issues for >> >> >>> >>>> planned features and bug fixes so that we have >> >> >>> >>>> visibility and opportunities for collaboration before a >> >> >>> >>>> PR shows up. >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> (This is for the Apache way.) >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> [1] >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> 2. Release on demand >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> Like DataFusion. >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> Release for apache/arrow doesn't include the Julia >> >> >>> >>>> implementation. >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> The Julia implementation uses separated version >> >> >>> >>>> scheme. (apache/arrow uses 6.0.0 as the next version >> >> >>> >>>> but the next Julia implementation release doesn't use >> >> >>> >>>> 6.0.0.) >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> [2] >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> We'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance >> >> >>> >>>> process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow after >> >> >>> >>>> the vote is passed. (We don't use julia/arrow/ in >> >> >>> >>>> apache/arrow.) >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> See also discussions about this: [3][4] >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> Please vote whether to accept the proposal and allow the >> >> >>> >>>> Julia community to proceed with the work. >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> [ ] +1 : Accept the proposal >> >> >>> >>>> [ ] 0 : No opinion >> >> >>> >>>> [ ] -1 : Reject proposal because... >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> [1] >> >> >>> >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TyrUP8_UWXqk97a8Hvb1d0UYWigch0HAephIjW7soSI/edit >> >> >>> >>>> [2] >> >> >>> >> >> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/master/dev/release/README.md >> >> >>> >>>> [3] >> >> >>> >> >> >> https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r6d91286686d92837fbe21dd042801a57e3a7b00b5903ea90a754ac7b%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E >> >> >>> >>>> [4] >> >> >>> >> >> >> https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r0df7f44f7e1ed7f6e4352d34047d53076208aa78aad308e30b58f83a%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> Thanks, >> >> >>> >>>> -- >> >> >>> >>>> kou >> >> >>> >> >> >>
