+1 (non-binding/I'm not important)

On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 11:40 AM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We have been discussing [1] standard interfaces for Arrow-based database
> access and have been working on implementations of the proposed interfaces
> [2], all under the name "ADBC". This proposal aims to provide a unified
> client abstraction across Arrow-native database protocols (like Flight SQL)
> and non-Arrow database protocols, which can then be used by Arrow projects
> like Dataset/Acero and ecosystem projects like Ibis.
>
> For details, see the RFC here: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14079
>
> I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along with
> apache/arrow-adbc commit 7866a56 [3], as version 1.0.0 of the ADBC API
> standard.
>
> Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. (This is not a
> vote to release any components.)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC specification
> [ ]  0
> [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because...
>
> Thanks to the DuckDB and R DBI projects for providing feedback on and
> implementations of the proposal.
>
> [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/cq7t9s5p7dw4vschylhwsfgqwkr5fmf2
> [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc
> [3]:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/commit/7866a566f5b7b635267bfb7a87ea49b01dfe89fa
>
> Thank you,
> David
>

Reply via email to