+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 1:16 PM Matthew Topol <m...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)! > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 1:34 PM Dewey Dunnington > <de...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote: > > > +1! (non-binding) > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 12:47 PM Gavin Ray <ray.gavi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding/I'm not important) > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 11:40 AM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > We have been discussing [1] standard interfaces for Arrow-based > > database > > > > access and have been working on implementations of the proposed > > > interfaces > > > > [2], all under the name "ADBC". This proposal aims to provide a > unified > > > > client abstraction across Arrow-native database protocols (like > Flight > > > SQL) > > > > and non-Arrow database protocols, which can then be used by Arrow > > > projects > > > > like Dataset/Acero and ecosystem projects like Ibis. > > > > > > > > For details, see the RFC here: > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14079 > > > > > > > > I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along > > with > > > > apache/arrow-adbc commit 7866a56 [3], as version 1.0.0 of the ADBC > API > > > > standard. > > > > > > > > Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. (This is > > not a > > > > vote to release any components.) > > > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC specification > > > > [ ] 0 > > > > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... > > > > > > > > Thanks to the DuckDB and R DBI projects for providing feedback on and > > > > implementations of the proposal. > > > > > > > > [1]: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/cq7t9s5p7dw4vschylhwsfgqwkr5fmf2 > > > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc > > > > [3]: > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/commit/7866a566f5b7b635267bfb7a87ea49b01dfe89fa > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > -- thanks ashish
