+1 In <f4b309f4-db20-43a3-8585-a27fd5ffb...@www.fastmail.com> "[VOTE] Adopt ADBC database client connectivity specification" on Wed, 21 Sep 2022 11:40:11 -0400, "David Li" <lidav...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello, > > We have been discussing [1] standard interfaces for Arrow-based database > access and have been working on implementations of the proposed interfaces > [2], all under the name "ADBC". This proposal aims to provide a unified > client abstraction across Arrow-native database protocols (like Flight SQL) > and non-Arrow database protocols, which can then be used by Arrow projects > like Dataset/Acero and ecosystem projects like Ibis. > > For details, see the RFC here: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14079 > > I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along with > apache/arrow-adbc commit 7866a56 [3], as version 1.0.0 of the ADBC API > standard. > > Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. (This is not a > vote to release any components.) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC specification > [ ] 0 > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... > > Thanks to the DuckDB and R DBI projects for providing feedback on and > implementations of the proposal. > > [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/cq7t9s5p7dw4vschylhwsfgqwkr5fmf2 > [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc > [3]: > https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/commit/7866a566f5b7b635267bfb7a87ea49b01dfe89fa > > Thank you, > David
