+ 1 (non-binding) On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 11:05 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote:
> Just another reminder - this has been open for a while with only one > binding vote. I know it's near 10.0.0 and I don't expect this to make the > release, but I'd appreciate if we could get this wrapped up one way or > another. > > Thanks, > David > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022, at 21:55, Steven Deobald wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 14:20, David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Just a reminder that this vote is still outstanding - if anyone (PMC or > >> not) is interested in taking a look. Thanks! > >> > >> -David > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022, at 05:40, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > I would urge people to review the proposed ADBC APIs, especially the > Go > >> > and Java APIs which probably benefitted from less feedback than the C > >> one. > >> > > >> > Regards > >> > > >> > Antoine. > >> > > >> > > >> > Le 21/09/2022 à 17:40, David Li a écrit : > >> >> Hello, > >> >> > >> >> We have been discussing [1] standard interfaces for Arrow-based > >> database access and have been working on implementations of the proposed > >> interfaces [2], all under the name "ADBC". This proposal aims to > provide a > >> unified client abstraction across Arrow-native database protocols (like > >> Flight SQL) and non-Arrow database protocols, which can then be used by > >> Arrow projects like Dataset/Acero and ecosystem projects like Ibis. > >> >> > >> >> For details, see the RFC here: > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14079 > >> >> > >> >> I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along > >> with apache/arrow-adbc commit 7866a56 [3], as version 1.0.0 of the ADBC > API > >> standard. > >> >> > >> >> Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. (This is > not > >> a vote to release any components.) > >> >> > >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >> >> > >> >> [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC specification > >> >> [ ] 0 > >> >> [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... > >> >> > >> >> Thanks to the DuckDB and R DBI projects for providing feedback on and > >> implementations of the proposal. > >> >> > >> >> [1]: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/cq7t9s5p7dw4vschylhwsfgqwkr5fmf2 > >> >> [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc > >> >> [3]: > >> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/commit/7866a566f5b7b635267bfb7a87ea49b01dfe89fa > >> >> > >> >> Thank you, > >> >> David > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > *Steven Deobald* > > > > XTDB Markets > > > > *Phone* +91 9845064156 (in) | +1 707-336-2253 (ca) > > > > *Email* d...@xtdb.com > > > > *Website* https://xtdb.com > > *Twitter* https://twitter.com/xtdb_com >
