Following up: I have created a PR adding the definition [1]. While writing this, I ended up feeling that it made sense to keep separate labels for "Critical Fix" and "Priority: Critical".
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33660 On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 2:54 AM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I replied in the GitHub thread [1], but will say that I am +1 on > Priority: > > Blocker and Priority: Critical. Though I wonder if we could use "Critical > > Fix" in place of "Priority: Critical"? Unless we have two different > > definitions. As is, the names are similar enough that it could be > > confusing. Perhaps I can draft a full definition of "Critical Fix", and > > then we can discuss based on that? (I assume at the very least that > > Priority Critical never refers to features, right?) > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/14593 > > > > Agreed on the Priority: Blocker and Priority: Critical. > A shared definition would indeed be useful! I think best place to put it > would be in the issue creation interface [2]. > > [2] > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new?assignees=&labels=Type%3A+bug&template=bug_report.yaml > > Rok >
