+1

On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 1:55 AM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> Thanks Kou!
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023, at 11:53, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > In <20230424.103259.664806138128874521....@clear-code.com>
> >   "[VOTE] Formalize how to change format" on Mon, 24 Apr 2023 10:32:59
> > +0900 (JST),
> >   Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would like to formalize how to change format process.
> >>
> >> See the following pull request and discussion for details:
> >>
> >> * GH-35084: [Docs][Format] Add how to change format specification
> >>   https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35174
> >>
> >>   Preview:
> http://crossbow.voltrondata.com/pr_docs/35174/format/Changing.html
> >>
> >> * [DISCUSS] Formalize how to change format
> >>   https://lists.apache.org/thread/cox8wz8y458n4dsko0rx6z5w9nqvcld3
> >>
> >> This is based on the following discussion:
> >>
> >>   [DISCUSS] Format changes: process and requirements
> >>   https://lists.apache.org/thread/9t0pglrvxjhrt4r4xcsc1zmgmbtr8pxj
> >>
> >> Summary:
> >>
> >> * The format means files in
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/main/format
> >> * We need to discuss and vote to change the format
> >> * We need at least two reference implementations and
> >>   integration tests to change the format
> >> * We can choose at least two implementations from the
> >>   followings:
> >>   * The C++ implementation
> >>   * The Java implementation
> >>   * The Rust (arrow-rs) implementation
> >>   * The Go implementation
> >> * NOTE: The C++ and Java implementations were candidates in
> >>   the initial discussion:
> >>     [DISCUSS] Format changes: process and requirements
> >>     https://lists.apache.org/thread/9t0pglrvxjhrt4r4xcsc1zmgmbtr8pxj
> >> * We can add a new implementation to the above "at least two
> >>   implementations" candidate list by "discuss and vote".
> >>
> >>
> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal
> >> [ ] +0
> >> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> kou
>

Reply via email to