+1 (Non-binding)

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 5:16 AM Joris Van den Bossche <
jorisvandenboss...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 at 04:18, Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've added one more note about documentation:
> >
> >   We must update the corresponding documentation (files in
> >   `<https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/main/docs/source/format>`_)
> >   too.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35174#issuecomment-1522572677
> >
> > See also the preview URL:
> > http://crossbow.voltrondata.com/pr_docs/35174/format/Changing.html
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > kou
> >
> > In <20230424.103259.664806138128874521....@clear-code.com>
> >   "[VOTE] Formalize how to change format" on Mon, 24 Apr 2023 10:32:59
> +0900 (JST),
> >   Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to formalize how to change format process.
> > >
> > > See the following pull request and discussion for details:
> > >
> > > * GH-35084: [Docs][Format] Add how to change format specification
> > >   https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35174
> > >
> > >   Preview:
> http://crossbow.voltrondata.com/pr_docs/35174/format/Changing.html
> > >
> > > * [DISCUSS] Formalize how to change format
> > >   https://lists.apache.org/thread/cox8wz8y458n4dsko0rx6z5w9nqvcld3
> > >
> > > This is based on the following discussion:
> > >
> > >   [DISCUSS] Format changes: process and requirements
> > >   https://lists.apache.org/thread/9t0pglrvxjhrt4r4xcsc1zmgmbtr8pxj
> > >
> > > Summary:
> > >
> > > * The format means files in
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/main/format
> > > * We need to discuss and vote to change the format
> > > * We need at least two reference implementations and
> > >   integration tests to change the format
> > > * We can choose at least two implementations from the
> > >   followings:
> > >   * The C++ implementation
> > >   * The Java implementation
> > >   * The Rust (arrow-rs) implementation
> > >   * The Go implementation
> > > * NOTE: The C++ and Java implementations were candidates in
> > >   the initial discussion:
> > >     [DISCUSS] Format changes: process and requirements
> > >     https://lists.apache.org/thread/9t0pglrvxjhrt4r4xcsc1zmgmbtr8pxj
> > > * We can add a new implementation to the above "at least two
> > >   implementations" candidate list by "discuss and vote".
> > >
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Accept this proposal
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --
> > > kou
>

Reply via email to