Looks like this might be related:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/691479/how-to-deal-with-missing-libcrypt-so-1-on-arch-linux
as manjaro also uses pacman and Arch Linux's packages.

I'm re-running the verification right now after installing the recommended
package in that thread. I'll report back if it solves the issue.

--Matt

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:29 AM Matthew Topol <m...@voltrondata.com> wrote:

> @Kou: I was able to reproduce the libcrypto failure that Jacob saw using
> https://hub.docker.com/r/manjarolinux/base though i did need to manually
> install git first since it doesn't come with it.
>
> $ pacman -Syu git
> $ git clone https://github.com/apache/arrow.git
> $ cd arrow
> $ TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=0 TEST_CPP=1 USE_CONDA=1
> dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 12.0.0 0
>
> That set of commands was sufficient to reproduce the error I believe (I
> did this on monday when I was poking around the failures but I definitely
> managed to see the same error pop up in a run). I'm running it again right
> now to confirm.
>
> --Matt
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 8:28 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for sharing the log.
>>
>> libcrypto.so isn't related on the segmentation fault. It's
>> just for relating to showing backtrace.
>>
>> > perl: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypt.so.1:
>> > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>>
>> This is happen at
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/cpp/build-support/run-test.sh#L42
>> :
>>
>>   TEST_NAME=$(echo $TEST_FILENAME | perl -pe 's/\..+?$//') # Remove path
>> and extension (if any).
>>
>> BTW, it seems that we should remove a Perl dependency from
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/cpp/build-support/run-test.sh
>> ...
>>
>>
>> I want to reproduce this problem on my environment. Could
>> you share your environment information? Did you use Manjaro
>> Linux this too?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> kou
>>
>>
>> In <canva0dgkodpfde7_b8xuvmtkh5kdmzvmtpbofo82hqj17gu...@mail.gmail.com>
>>   "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 12.0.0 - RC0" on Thu, 27 Apr 2023
>> 23:54:58 +0200,
>>   Jacob Wujciak <ja...@voltrondata.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>> > I have uploaded the log [1] for the run using conda with gandiva
>> active. It
>> > looks like there is an issue with libcrypt.so causing these tests to
>> > segfault.
>> >
>> > 1: https://gist.github.com/assignUser/cba0a13875de9d6a4f31000f585244f0
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:32 PM Will Jones <will.jones...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Raul,
>> >>
>> >> It might be worth creating a new RC that fixes more of the test issues,
>> >> even if they shouldn't be blockers. I've run the release script a few
>> >> different times, and after 1.5 hours (is that a normal runtime for
>> >> verification?) I get various test failures. So far the errors are in
>> the
>> >> TEST_PYTHON, TEST_WHEELS, and TEST_JAVA. I'll have more time tomorrow
>> to
>> >> look at the failures I am seeing.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 8:09 AM Raúl Cumplido <raulcumpl...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > The vote for the RC has been open for 5 days.
>> >> >
>> >> > I will wait until tomorrow, if no more +1 votes are casted I
>> >> > understand that the issue related to the pandas failures
>> >> > (https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/35321) is causing
>> verification
>> >> > to fail and we require a new RC with the above fix.
>> >> >
>> >> > Let me know if there are other blockers that should be included in
>> that
>> >> > case.
>> >> >
>> >> > Kind regards,
>> >> > Raúl
>> >> >
>> >> > El jue, 27 abr 2023 a las 16:08, Sutou Kouhei (<k...@clear-code.com>)
>> >> > escribió:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Hi,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I tried this on a manjarolinux/base Docker image.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I think that this is a problem of the Arch Linux's llvm
>> >> > > package. LLVMExports.cmake in the package doesn't provide
>> >> > > the LLVMX86CodeGen target:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > # grep add_library /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVMExports.cmake
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMDemangle STATIC IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMSupport STATIC IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMTableGen STATIC IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LTO SHARED IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMgold MODULE IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LLVM SHARED IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(Remarks SHARED IMPORTED)
>> >> > >
>> >> > > FYI: LLVMExports.cmake on Debian GNU/Linux provides many
>> >> > > targets:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > $ grep add_library
>> /usr/lib/llvm-15/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVMExports.cmake |
>> >> > head
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMDemangle STATIC IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMSupport STATIC IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMTableGen STATIC IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMTableGenGlobalISel STATIC IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMCore STATIC IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMFuzzerCLI STATIC IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMFuzzMutate STATIC IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMFileCheck STATIC IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMInterfaceStub STATIC IMPORTED)
>> >> > > add_library(LLVMIRReader STATIC IMPORTED)
>> >> > >
>> >> > > $ grep add_library
>> /usr/lib/llvm-15/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVMExports.cmake |
>> >> > wc -l
>> >> > > 195
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thanks,
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > kou
>> >> > >
>> >> > > In <CANva0dgrkkaAb_dbnSLXuVxi=
>> h22i0yjhbtde-y3-rflox8...@mail.gmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> > >   "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 12.0.0 - RC0" on Tue, 25 Apr
>> 2023
>> >> > 23:50:21 +0200,
>> >> > >   Jacob Wujciak <ja...@voltrondata.com.INVALID> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > I checked out a trace for the cmake issue and LLVM 15.07 is found
>> >> > > > correctly. The issue come from `llvm_map_components_to_libnames`
>> >> which
>> >> > > > complains about X86 not being in the lsit of libraries. But we
>> don't
>> >> > add
>> >> > > > that but rather it gets appended in the function?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(228):
>> >> > > >  get_property(LLVM_TARGETS_CONFIGURED GLOBAL PROPERTY
>> >> > > > LLVM_TARGETS_CONFIGURED )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(234):  if(NOT
>> >> > LLVM_TARGETS_CONFIGURED
>> >> > > > )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(244):  list(FIND
>> >> > > > LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD X86 have_native_backend )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(245):  list(FIND
>> >> link_components
>> >> > > > engine engine_required )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(246):  if(NOT
>> engine_required
>> >> > EQUAL
>> >> > > > -1 )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(255):  list(FIND
>> >> link_components
>> >> > > > native native_required )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(256):  if(NOT
>> native_required
>> >> > EQUAL
>> >> > > > -1 )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(257):  if(NOT
>> >> have_native_backend
>> >> > > > EQUAL -1 )
>> >> > > > */usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(258):  list(APPEND
>> >> > link_components
>> >> > > > X86 )*
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(263):
>> >> > > >  llvm_expand_pseudo_components(link_components
>> >> > > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> core;mcjit;native;ipo;bitreader;target;linker;analysis;debuginfodwarf;X86 )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(127):  set(link_components
>> >> > > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> core;mcjit;native;ipo;bitreader;target;linker;analysis;debuginfodwarf;X86 )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(128):  foreach(c
>> >> > > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> core;mcjit;native;ipo;bitreader;target;linker;analysis;debuginfodwarf;X86 )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(130):  list(FIND
>> >> > > > LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD core idx )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(131):  if(NOT idx LESS 0 )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(159):  elseif(c STREQUAL
>> >> > > > nativecodegen )
>> >> > > > [snip]
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(212):  list(APPEND
>> >> > > > expanded_components debuginfodwarf )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(130):  list(FIND
>> >> > > > LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD X86 idx )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(131):  if(NOT idx LESS 0 )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(132):  if(TARGET
>> >> LLVMX86CodeGen )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(134):  else()
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(135):  if(TARGET LLVMX86 )
>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(137):  else()
>> >> > > > */usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(138):  message(FATAL_ERROR
>> >> > Target
>> >> > > > X86 is not in the set of libraries. )*
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:57 AM Raúl Cumplido <
>> >> raulcumpl...@gmail.com
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >> I have created the following issue for the new wheels test
>> failure
>> >> > > >> around pandas 2.0.1 :
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/35321
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> I don't think we should create a new RC for that issue but I'm
>> happy
>> >> > > >> to know other people's thoughts around that.
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> El lun, 24 abr 2023 a las 21:12, Raúl Cumplido
>> >> > > >> (<raulcumpl...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > El lun, 24 abr 2023 a las 18:53, Will Jones
>> >> > > >> > (<will.jones...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> >> > > >> > >
>> >> > > >> > > I'm seeing failing Pandas tests in PyArrow when verifying
>> with
>> >> > > >> > >
>> >> > > >> > > USE_CONDA=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 12.0.0 0
>> >> > > >> > >
>> >> > > >> > >
>> >> > > >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> pyarrow/tests/test_extension_type.py::test_extension_to_pandas_storage_type[registered_period_type0]
>> >> > > >> > > - NotImplementedError: extension<test.period<PeriodType>>
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > This is also happening on our nightlies from today:
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/actions/runs/4786502455/jobs/8510514881
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > There has been a new pandas release: 2.0.1 around 9 hours ago
>> >> which
>> >> > > >> > seems to be the causing issue:
>> >> > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/pandas/#history
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > >
>> >> > > >> > > No one else is getting that?
>> >> > > >> > >
>> >> > > >> > >
>> >> > > >> > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 9:21 AM Raúl Cumplido <
>> >> > raulcumpl...@gmail.com>
>> >> > > >> > > wrote:
>> >> > > >> > >
>> >> > > >> > > > +1 (non binding)
>> >> > > >> > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > I have tested both SOURCES and BINARIES successfully with:
>> >> > > >> > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
>> >> > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
>> >> > > >> > > > 12.0.0 0
>> >> > > >> > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_WHEELS=1
>> >> > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
>> >> > > >> > > > 12.0.0 0
>> >> > > >> > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARIES=1
>> >> > > >> dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
>> >> > > >> > > > 12.0.0 0
>> >> > > >> > > > with:
>> >> > > >> > > >   * Python 3.10.6
>> >> > > >> > > >   * gcc (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.3.0
>> >> > > >> > > >   * NVIDIA CUDA cuda_11.5.r11.5/compiler.30672275_0
>> >> > > >> > > >   * openjdk version "17.0.6" 2023-01-17
>> >> > > >> > > >   * ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233)
>> >> > > >> [x86_64-linux-gnu]
>> >> > > >> > > >   * dotnet 7.0.203
>> >> > > >> > > >   * Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
>> >> > > >> > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > El dom, 23 abr 2023 a las 12:59, Yibo Cai (<
>> yibo....@arm.com
>> >> >)
>> >> > > >> escribió:
>> >> > > >> > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > +1
>> >> > > >> > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > I ran the followings on Ubuntu-22.04, aarch64.
>> >> > > >> > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 \
>> >> > > >> > > > >    TEST_CPP=1 \
>> >> > > >> > > > >    TEST_PYTHON=1 \
>> >> > > >> > > > >    TEST_GO=1 \
>> >> > > >> > > > >    dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 12.0.0 0
>> >> > > >> > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 \
>> >> > > >> > > > >    TEST_WHEELS=1 \
>> >> > > >> > > > >    dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 12.0.0 0
>> >> > > >> > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > On 4/23/23 14:40, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>> >> > > >> > > > > > +1
>> >> > > >> > > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > > I ran the followings on Debian GNU/Linux sid:
>> >> > > >> > > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > >    * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        TEST_SOURCE=1 \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        LANG=C \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        TZ=UTC \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        CUDAToolkit_ROOT=/usr \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        ARROW_CMAKE_OPTIONS="-DBoost_NO_BOOST_CMAKE=ON
>> >> > > >> > > > -Dxsimd_SOURCE=BUNDLED" \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 12.0.0
>> 0
>> >> > > >> > > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > >    * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        TEST_APT=1 \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        LANG=C \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 12.0.0
>> 0
>> >> > > >> > > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > >    * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        TEST_BINARY=1 \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        LANG=C \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 12.0.0
>> 0
>> >> > > >> > > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > >    * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        TEST_JARS=1 \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        LANG=C \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 12.0.0
>> 0
>> >> > > >> > > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > >    * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        TEST_PYTHON_VERSIONS=3.11 \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        TEST_WHEELS=1 \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        LANG=C \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 12.0.0
>> 0
>> >> > > >> > > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > >    * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        TEST_YUM=1 \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        LANG=C \
>> >> > > >> > > > > >        dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 12.0.0
>> 0
>> >> > > >> > > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > > with:
>> >> > > >> > > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > >    * .NET SDK (6.0.406)
>> >> > > >> > > > > >    * Python 3.11.2
>> >> > > >> > > > > >    * gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
>> >> > > >> > > > > >    * nvidia-cuda-dev 11.7.99~11.7.1-4
>> >> > > >> > > > > >    * openjdk version "17.0.6" 2023-01-17
>> >> > > >> > > > > >    * ruby 3.1.2p20 (2022-04-12 revision 4491bb740a)
>> >> > > >> [x86_64-linux-gnu]
>> >> > > >> > > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > >
>> >> > > >> > > > > > Thanks,
>> >> > > >> > > >
>> >> > > >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>

Reply via email to