Hi, Thanks everyone. The result of the vote is successful with 3 +1 binding votes, 1 +1 non-binding vote and no -1 votes.
I will start the post release tasks [1]. Thanks, Raúl [1] https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/developers/release.html#post-release-tasks El sáb, 29 abr 2023 a las 18:38, Will Jones (<will.jones...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > Sounds good. My vote is +1. > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 9:59 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for digging into this! > > I couldn't notice that we can fix the libcrypt.so.1 error > > from Perl by installing libxcrypt-compat. > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35362 is another > > approach to avoid the error. > > > > > > Anyway, I think that we solved all reported problems for > > RC0. I think that we can close this vote and release 12.0.0. > > > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > kou > > > > In <cajdg-vt-_yux1wcc5_jyh+p30qockahzzpm4tv+06jr4_se...@mail.gmail.com> > > "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 12.0.0 - RC0" on Fri, 28 Apr 2023 > > 11:59:09 -0400, > > Matthew Topol <m...@voltrondata.com.INVALID> wrote: > > > > > Okay, I confirmed that by running the following two commands, the test > > > failures that Jacob found on Manjarolinux were solved (at least in the > > > container I was using) > > > > > > $ pacman -S libxcrypt-compat > > > $ ln -s /usr/share/zoneinfo/America/New_York /etc/localtime > > > > > > For the second command it looks like the /etc/localtime symbolic link > > > wasn't being set in the container and is leveraged by the Orc adapter > > > tests. So setting the localtime (to any valid zone info) was sufficient > > to > > > let the tests run and pass. > > > > > > Hope this helps! > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:49 AM Matthew Topol <m...@voltrondata.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Looks like this might be related: > > >> > > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/691479/how-to-deal-with-missing-libcrypt-so-1-on-arch-linux > > >> as manjaro also uses pacman and Arch Linux's packages. > > >> > > >> I'm re-running the verification right now after installing the > > recommended > > >> package in that thread. I'll report back if it solves the issue. > > >> > > >> --Matt > > >> > > >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:29 AM Matthew Topol <m...@voltrondata.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> @Kou: I was able to reproduce the libcrypto failure that Jacob saw > > using > > >>> https://hub.docker.com/r/manjarolinux/base though i did need to > > manually > > >>> install git first since it doesn't come with it. > > >>> > > >>> $ pacman -Syu git > > >>> $ git clone https://github.com/apache/arrow.git > > >>> $ cd arrow > > >>> $ TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=0 TEST_CPP=1 USE_CONDA=1 > > >>> dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 12.0.0 0 > > >>> > > >>> That set of commands was sufficient to reproduce the error I believe (I > > >>> did this on monday when I was poking around the failures but I > > definitely > > >>> managed to see the same error pop up in a run). I'm running it again > > right > > >>> now to confirm. > > >>> > > >>> --Matt > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 8:28 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks for sharing the log. > > >>>> > > >>>> libcrypto.so isn't related on the segmentation fault. It's > > >>>> just for relating to showing backtrace. > > >>>> > > >>>> > perl: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypt.so.1: > > >>>> > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > >>>> > > >>>> This is happen at > > >>>> > > >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/cpp/build-support/run-test.sh#L42 > > >>>> : > > >>>> > > >>>> TEST_NAME=$(echo $TEST_FILENAME | perl -pe 's/\..+?$//') # Remove > > path > > >>>> and extension (if any). > > >>>> > > >>>> BTW, it seems that we should remove a Perl dependency from > > >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/cpp/build-support/run-test.sh > > >>>> ... > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> I want to reproduce this problem on my environment. Could > > >>>> you share your environment information? Did you use Manjaro > > >>>> Linux this too? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks, > > >>>> -- > > >>>> kou > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> In < > > canva0dgkodpfde7_b8xuvmtkh5kdmzvmtpbofo82hqj17gu...@mail.gmail.com> > > >>>> "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 12.0.0 - RC0" on Thu, 27 Apr 2023 > > >>>> 23:54:58 +0200, > > >>>> Jacob Wujciak <ja...@voltrondata.com.INVALID> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > I have uploaded the log [1] for the run using conda with gandiva > > >>>> active. It > > >>>> > looks like there is an issue with libcrypt.so causing these tests to > > >>>> > segfault. > > >>>> > > > >>>> > 1: > > https://gist.github.com/assignUser/cba0a13875de9d6a4f31000f585244f0 > > >>>> > > > >>>> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:32 PM Will Jones < > > will.jones...@gmail.com> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > > >>>> >> Hi Raul, > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> It might be worth creating a new RC that fixes more of the test > > >>>> issues, > > >>>> >> even if they shouldn't be blockers. I've run the release script a > > few > > >>>> >> different times, and after 1.5 hours (is that a normal runtime for > > >>>> >> verification?) I get various test failures. So far the errors are > > in > > >>>> the > > >>>> >> TEST_PYTHON, TEST_WHEELS, and TEST_JAVA. I'll have more time > > tomorrow > > >>>> to > > >>>> >> look at the failures I am seeing. > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 8:09 AM Raúl Cumplido < > > raulcumpl...@gmail.com > > >>>> > > > >>>> >> wrote: > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > Hi, > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > The vote for the RC has been open for 5 days. > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > I will wait until tomorrow, if no more +1 votes are casted I > > >>>> >> > understand that the issue related to the pandas failures > > >>>> >> > (https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/35321) is causing > > >>>> verification > > >>>> >> > to fail and we require a new RC with the above fix. > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > Let me know if there are other blockers that should be included > > in > > >>>> that > > >>>> >> > case. > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > Kind regards, > > >>>> >> > Raúl > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > El jue, 27 abr 2023 a las 16:08, Sutou Kouhei (< > > k...@clear-code.com > > >>>> >) > > >>>> >> > escribió: > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > Hi, > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > I tried this on a manjarolinux/base Docker image. > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > I think that this is a problem of the Arch Linux's llvm > > >>>> >> > > package. LLVMExports.cmake in the package doesn't provide > > >>>> >> > > the LLVMX86CodeGen target: > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > # grep add_library /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVMExports.cmake > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMDemangle STATIC IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMSupport STATIC IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMTableGen STATIC IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LTO SHARED IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMgold MODULE IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVM SHARED IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(Remarks SHARED IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > FYI: LLVMExports.cmake on Debian GNU/Linux provides many > > >>>> >> > > targets: > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > $ grep add_library > > >>>> /usr/lib/llvm-15/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVMExports.cmake | > > >>>> >> > head > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMDemangle STATIC IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMSupport STATIC IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMTableGen STATIC IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMTableGenGlobalISel STATIC IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMCore STATIC IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMFuzzerCLI STATIC IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMFuzzMutate STATIC IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMFileCheck STATIC IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMInterfaceStub STATIC IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > add_library(LLVMIRReader STATIC IMPORTED) > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > $ grep add_library > > >>>> /usr/lib/llvm-15/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVMExports.cmake | > > >>>> >> > wc -l > > >>>> >> > > 195 > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > Thanks, > > >>>> >> > > -- > > >>>> >> > > kou > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > In <CANva0dgrkkaAb_dbnSLXuVxi= > > >>>> h22i0yjhbtde-y3-rflox8...@mail.gmail.com > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 12.0.0 - RC0" on Tue, 25 Apr > > >>>> 2023 > > >>>> >> > 23:50:21 +0200, > > >>>> >> > > Jacob Wujciak <ja...@voltrondata.com.INVALID> wrote: > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > I checked out a trace for the cmake issue and LLVM 15.07 is > > >>>> found > > >>>> >> > > > correctly. The issue come from > > `llvm_map_components_to_libnames` > > >>>> >> which > > >>>> >> > > > complains about X86 not being in the lsit of libraries. But > > we > > >>>> don't > > >>>> >> > add > > >>>> >> > > > that but rather it gets appended in the function? > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(228): > > >>>> >> > > > get_property(LLVM_TARGETS_CONFIGURED GLOBAL PROPERTY > > >>>> >> > > > LLVM_TARGETS_CONFIGURED ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(234): if(NOT > > >>>> >> > LLVM_TARGETS_CONFIGURED > > >>>> >> > > > ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(244): list(FIND > > >>>> >> > > > LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD X86 have_native_backend ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(245): list(FIND > > >>>> >> link_components > > >>>> >> > > > engine engine_required ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(246): if(NOT > > >>>> engine_required > > >>>> >> > EQUAL > > >>>> >> > > > -1 ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(255): list(FIND > > >>>> >> link_components > > >>>> >> > > > native native_required ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(256): if(NOT > > >>>> native_required > > >>>> >> > EQUAL > > >>>> >> > > > -1 ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(257): if(NOT > > >>>> >> have_native_backend > > >>>> >> > > > EQUAL -1 ) > > >>>> >> > > > */usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(258): list(APPEND > > >>>> >> > link_components > > >>>> >> > > > X86 )* > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(263): > > >>>> >> > > > llvm_expand_pseudo_components(link_components > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > >>>> > > core;mcjit;native;ipo;bitreader;target;linker;analysis;debuginfodwarf;X86 ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(127): > > set(link_components > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > >>>> > > core;mcjit;native;ipo;bitreader;target;linker;analysis;debuginfodwarf;X86 ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(128): foreach(c > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > >>>> > > core;mcjit;native;ipo;bitreader;target;linker;analysis;debuginfodwarf;X86 ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(130): list(FIND > > >>>> >> > > > LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD core idx ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(131): if(NOT idx LESS > > 0 ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(159): elseif(c > > STREQUAL > > >>>> >> > > > nativecodegen ) > > >>>> >> > > > [snip] > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(212): list(APPEND > > >>>> >> > > > expanded_components debuginfodwarf ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(130): list(FIND > > >>>> >> > > > LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD X86 idx ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(131): if(NOT idx LESS > > 0 ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(132): if(TARGET > > >>>> >> LLVMX86CodeGen ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(134): else() > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(135): if(TARGET > > LLVMX86 ) > > >>>> >> > > > /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(137): else() > > >>>> >> > > > */usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVM-Config.cmake(138): > > >>>> message(FATAL_ERROR > > >>>> >> > Target > > >>>> >> > > > X86 is not in the set of libraries. )* > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:57 AM Raúl Cumplido < > > >>>> >> raulcumpl...@gmail.com > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > wrote: > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> I have created the following issue for the new wheels test > > >>>> failure > > >>>> >> > > >> around pandas 2.0.1 : > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/35321 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> I don't think we should create a new RC for that issue but > > I'm > > >>>> happy > > >>>> >> > > >> to know other people's thoughts around that. > > >>>> >> > > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> El lun, 24 abr 2023 a las 21:12, Raúl Cumplido > > >>>> >> > > >> (<raulcumpl...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > >>>> >> > > >> > El lun, 24 abr 2023 a las 18:53, Will Jones > > >>>> >> > > >> > (<will.jones...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > I'm seeing failing Pandas tests in PyArrow when > > verifying > > >>>> with > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > USE_CONDA=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh > > 12.0.0 > > >>>> 0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > >>>> > > pyarrow/tests/test_extension_type.py::test_extension_to_pandas_storage_type[registered_period_type0] > > >>>> >> > > >> > > - NotImplementedError: > > extension<test.period<PeriodType>> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > >>>> >> > > >> > This is also happening on our nightlies from today: > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > >>>> > > https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/actions/runs/4786502455/jobs/8510514881 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > >>>> >> > > >> > There has been a new pandas release: 2.0.1 around 9 hours > > ago > > >>>> >> which > > >>>> >> > > >> > seems to be the causing issue: > > >>>> >> > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/pandas/#history > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > No one else is getting that? > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 9:21 AM Raúl Cumplido < > > >>>> >> > raulcumpl...@gmail.com> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > wrote: > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > +1 (non binding) > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > I have tested both SOURCES and BINARIES successfully > > >>>> with: > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 > > >>>> >> > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > 12.0.0 0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_WHEELS=1 > > >>>> >> > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > 12.0.0 0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARIES=1 > > >>>> >> > > >> dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > 12.0.0 0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > with: > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > * Python 3.10.6 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > * gcc (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.3.0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > * NVIDIA CUDA cuda_11.5.r11.5/compiler.30672275_0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > * openjdk version "17.0.6" 2023-01-17 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > * ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) > > >>>> >> > > >> [x86_64-linux-gnu] > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > * dotnet 7.0.203 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > * Ubuntu 22.04 LTS > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > El dom, 23 abr 2023 a las 12:59, Yibo Cai (< > > >>>> yibo....@arm.com > > >>>> >> >) > > >>>> >> > > >> escribió: > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > +1 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > I ran the followings on Ubuntu-22.04, aarch64. > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > TEST_CPP=1 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > TEST_PYTHON=1 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > TEST_GO=1 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 12.0.0 0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > TEST_WHEELS=1 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 12.0.0 0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > On 4/23/23 14:40, Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > +1 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > I ran the followings on Debian GNU/Linux sid: > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > TEST_SOURCE=1 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > LANG=C \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > TZ=UTC \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > CUDAToolkit_ROOT=/usr \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > > ARROW_CMAKE_OPTIONS="-DBoost_NO_BOOST_CMAKE=ON > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > -Dxsimd_SOURCE=BUNDLED" \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh > > >>>> 12.0.0 0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > TEST_APT=1 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > LANG=C \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh > > >>>> 12.0.0 0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > TEST_BINARY=1 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > LANG=C \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh > > >>>> 12.0.0 0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > TEST_JARS=1 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > LANG=C \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh > > >>>> 12.0.0 0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > TEST_PYTHON_VERSIONS=3.11 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > TEST_WHEELS=1 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > LANG=C \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh > > >>>> 12.0.0 0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > TEST_YUM=1 \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > LANG=C \ > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh > > >>>> 12.0.0 0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > with: > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > * .NET SDK (6.0.406) > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > * Python 3.11.2 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > * gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > * nvidia-cuda-dev 11.7.99~11.7.1-4 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > * openjdk version "17.0.6" 2023-01-17 > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > * ruby 3.1.2p20 (2022-04-12 revision > > 4491bb740a) > > >>>> >> > > >> [x86_64-linux-gnu] > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > Thanks, > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > >>>> > > >>> > >
