Hi Divyansh, As Dane pointed out, I did leave some code review comments earlier today on the PR that may provide some guidance on how to address the CI failures.
If you have any specific questions about any of the code review feedback, please feel free to continue the discussion on the PR, and I will be happy to provide further assistance. Best Regards, Kevin Gurney ________________________________ From: Dane Pitkin <d...@voltrondata.com.INVALID> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 3:49 PM To: dev@arrow.apache.org <dev@arrow.apache.org> Subject: Re: Request for Assistance with MATLAB CI Workflow Issue Hey Divyansh, I suggest discussing this on the PR[1] itself. You will get the best discussion there, where comments can be added to the code review directly. It looks like there is a MATLAB reviewer that has already left feedback that may be helpful. [1]https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/38274<https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/38274> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 2:28 PM Divyansh Khatri <divyanshkhatri...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am currently working on GitHub Issue #38211, titled "[MATLAB] Add support > for creating an empty arrow.tabular.RecordBatch by calling > arrow.recordBatch with no input arguments." As a beginner in MATLAB > development, I am facing challenges with the failing MATLAB CI workflow > associated with this issue. We need to ensure that all the appropriate test > cases pass as expected. > If you have any insights or suggestions on how to fix this issue, please > share them with me. > > -Divyansh >
