+1 (binding) I reviewed the spec proposal and the rust implementation and I think they look good to go. I am not as confident on the golang implementation, but the comments on the Go PR look like there are no objections.
Thank you for your work driving this forward Andrew On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:04 PM Adam C <adam.curtis....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to propose a change to the FlightSQL specification as > originally described in this Github issue [1] by Andrew Lamb. The > specification change would allow servers to support prepared > statements with parameters, without needing to manage state between > client requests. > > There is a draft pull request [2] submitted by me that updates the > protobuf format and documents the changes made in the FlightSQL > specification. I have also created draft reference implementations for > the Go [3] and Rust [4] FlightSQL libraries. These implementations > will be submitted as pull requests once the proposal is officially > adopted. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Rust > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Rust because... > > Cheers, > Adam Curtis > > [1]: > https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/37720 > [2]: > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/40243 > [3]: > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/40311 > [4]: > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/5433 >
