With 7 +1 votes and 0 -1 votes the proposal is approved. Thank you to everyone who voted.
I will update the PR for the specification change from draft status to ready to merge. I will then follow up with getting the client implementations ready to merge. Thanks again, Adam Curtis On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 2:39 AM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > > +1 > > In <can6nccpwbyqko7qxa451dv_rhfseenoo3dctfbknz8z2yck...@mail.gmail.com> > "[VOTE] Stateless prepared statements in FlightSQL" on Wed, 20 Mar 2024 > 19:48:38 -0400, > Adam C <adam.curtis....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to propose a change to the FlightSQL specification as > > originally described in this Github issue [1] by Andrew Lamb. The > > specification change would allow servers to support prepared > > statements with parameters, without needing to manage state between > > client requests. > > > > There is a draft pull request [2] submitted by me that updates the > > protobuf format and documents the changes made in the FlightSQL > > specification. I have also created draft reference implementations for > > the Go [3] and Rust [4] FlightSQL libraries. These implementations > > will be submitted as pull requests once the proposal is officially > > adopted. > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Rust > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Rust because... > > > > Cheers, > > Adam Curtis > > > > [1]: > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/37720 > > [2]: > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/40243 > > [3]: > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/40311 > > [4]: > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/5433
