+1

PS: Before we create the repo, we might discuss whether it should be
called arrow-csharp or arrow-dotnet. I think the latter makes more
sense.

On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 6:13 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose splitting C# release process.
>
> Motivation:
>
> * We want to reduce needless major releases because major
>   releases require users' change
>
> Approach:
>
> 1. Extract csharp/ in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-csharp like
>    apache/arrow-go
>    * Filter csharp/ related commits from apache/arrow and create
>      apache/arrow-csharp with them like we did for apache/arrow-go
>    * Remove csharp/ related codes from apache/arrow
> 2. Prepare integration test CI like apache/arrow-go does:
>    
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/blob/21de5d0b84289a0d37974fa6bd0852407d2c0d00/.github/workflows/test.yml#L347-L402
> 3. Prepare release script based on apache/arrow-go and
>    apache/arrow-java.
>
> New release process:
>
> * apache/arrow-csharp will be released separated from
>   apache/arrow
> * Curt will be a release manager of apache/arrow-csharp and
>   there are some PMC members who help apache/arrow-csharp
>   releases
> * apache/arrow releases a new major version per 3-4 months
>   but apache/arrow-csharp will use more longer major release
>   cycle
>   * apache/arrow-csharp will use more minor/patch releases
>     than apache/arrow
>
> See also the discussion of this:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/xbtq1ndjnljyo9jpm4ozblq9wx7hrc7y
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou

Reply via email to