Hi Curt, It seems that you're busy to complete the following PRs in apache/arrow:
* https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/44783 * https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46190 How about moving csharp/ in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-dotnet and continue them in apache/arrow-dotnet? Thanks, -- kou In <20250423.161348.1822813613714377052....@clear-code.com> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:13:48 +0900 (JST), Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It makes sense. Let's complete the followings in > apache/arrow before we move the C# implementation to > apache/arrow-dotnet from apache/arrow: > > * https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/44783 > * https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46190 > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In <cao-cae5lqb35qaggpe9yoy9trl7brfkiakuuqcdsdsgkvpk...@mail.gmail.com> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:48:46 > -0700, > Curt Hagenlocher <c...@hagenlocher.org> wrote: > >> In addition to the Flight SQL client, there's a new PR from yesterday and >> maybe only 1-2 others that aren't super stale. I'll make a concerted effort >> to resolve those, and for the remainder -- most of which are pending >> authorial input -- we'll ask them to resubmit in the new repo. >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 6:01 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> When can we move the C# implementation to >>> apache/arrow-dotnet from apache/arrow? >>> >>> There are some C# related PRs in apache/arrow: >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Component%3A+C%23%22 >>> >>> Can we continue them in apache/arrow-dotnet? (PR authors >>> need to re-open PRs in apache/arrow-dotnet.) >>> >>> For example, should we complete "GH-44800: [C#] Implement >>> Flight SQL Client" >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/44783 in apache/arrow? >>> Or should we continue it in apache/arrow-dotnet? >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -- >>> kou >>> >>> In <20250331.120021.2046206843285859352....@clear-code.com> >>> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 31 Mar 2025 >>> 12:00:21 +0900 (JST), >>> Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I've created https://github.com/apache/arrow-dotnet and >>> > opened an issue for importing commits from apache/arrow: >>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-dotnet/issues/1 >>> > >>> > Let's create issues on >>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-dotnet for other tasks. >>> > >>> > Upcoming 20.0.0 release will include the C# implementation >>> > but the next release of it will not include the C# >>> > implementation. >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > -- >>> > kou >>> > >>> > In <20250324.143530.31638564000205432....@clear-code.com> >>> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 24 Mar 2025 >>> 14:35:30 +0900 (JST), >>> > Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > Thanks for sharing your opinions. Let's use arrow-dotnet. >>> > > >>> > > If there are any people who want to work on this, I'll help >>> > > them. Otherwise, I'll work on this like I did for >>> > > apache/arrow-go and apache/arrow-java. >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > -- >>> > > kou >>> > > >>> > > In <cagzxcpffmsafggv0huju3e8jv8xawdls9l7f2vhmieqx+3n...@mail.gmail.com >>> > >>> > > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Fri, 21 Mar 2025 >>> 15:36:03 +1300, >>> > > Adam Reeve <adre...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> I'd also prefer arrow-dotnet, as I think the fact it's for use on the >>> .NET >>> > >> platform is the more important factor to highlight rather than the >>> language >>> > >> it's written in. The majority of users will be using C# but I'm sure >>> there >>> > >> are some F# users of Arrow out there. >>> > >> >>> > >> That said, I don't feel that strongly against arrow-csharp either. >>> > >> >>> > >> On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 15:18, Curt Hagenlocher <c...@hagenlocher.org> >>> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >>> Yes, but can we weight each repository by the number of stars it >>> has? :P >>> > >>> >>> > >>> I think arrow-dotnet is a better name, but it's a mild preference at >>> best. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 6:01 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > The vote carries with 5 +1 binding votes. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Let's discuss the new repository name as suggested by Bryce. >>> > >>> > Should we use arrow-dotnet not arrow-csharp? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > FYI: The number of GitHub repositories that include "dotnet" or >>> > >>> > "csharp" in their name: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > * "dotnet": 164K >>> > >>> > https://github.com/search?q=dotnet&type=repositories >>> > >>> > * "csharp": 257K >>> > >>> > https://github.com/search?q=csharp&type=repositories >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > kou >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > In <20250317.101329.2226182884160584389....@clear-code.com> >>> > >>> > "[VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:13:29 >>> +0900 >>> > >>> > (JST), >>> > >>> > Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > Hi, >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > I would like to propose splitting C# release process. >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > Motivation: >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > * We want to reduce needless major releases because major >>> > >>> > > releases require users' change >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > Approach: >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > 1. Extract csharp/ in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-csharp like >>> > >>> > > apache/arrow-go >>> > >>> > > * Filter csharp/ related commits from apache/arrow and create >>> > >>> > > apache/arrow-csharp with them like we did for >>> apache/arrow-go >>> > >>> > > * Remove csharp/ related codes from apache/arrow >>> > >>> > > 2. Prepare integration test CI like apache/arrow-go does: >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/blob/21de5d0b84289a0d37974fa6bd0852407d2c0d00/.github/workflows/test.yml#L347-L402 >>> > >>> > > 3. Prepare release script based on apache/arrow-go and >>> > >>> > > apache/arrow-java. >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > New release process: >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > * apache/arrow-csharp will be released separated from >>> > >>> > > apache/arrow >>> > >>> > > * Curt will be a release manager of apache/arrow-csharp and >>> > >>> > > there are some PMC members who help apache/arrow-csharp >>> > >>> > > releases >>> > >>> > > * apache/arrow releases a new major version per 3-4 months >>> > >>> > > but apache/arrow-csharp will use more longer major release >>> > >>> > > cycle >>> > >>> > > * apache/arrow-csharp will use more minor/patch releases >>> > >>> > > than apache/arrow >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > See also the discussion of this: >>> > >>> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/xbtq1ndjnljyo9jpm4ozblq9wx7hrc7y >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > [ ] +1 Accept this proposal >>> > >>> > > [ ] +0 >>> > >>> > > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > >>> > > -- >>> > >>> > > kou >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> > >>>
