On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 at 18:10, Alenka Frim <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1, the protocol is widely adopted [1] and there have been no issues > reported so far.
Indeed, +1 > > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/39195 > > V V sre., 1. okt. 2025 ob 17:15 je oseba Rok Mihevc <[email protected]> > napisala: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2025 at 2:43 PM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Just +1 from me. > > > More generally, we should do a pass on our documentation and docstrings > > to > > > find other things marked experimental that are due for an official > > status. > > > > > > Le 1 octobre 2025 11:38:27 GMT+02:00, "Raúl Cumplido" <[email protected] > > > > > > a écrit : > > > >Hi, > > > > > > > >I wanted to discuss removing the Experimental warning on the PyCapsule > > > >protocol documentation [1]. Now reads: > > > >Warning: > > > >The Arrow PyCapsule Interface should be considered experimental > > > > > > > >There haven't been major updates to the PyCapsule Interface during the > > > last > > > >2 years, since it was created and has seen widespread usage as tracked > > on > > > >this comment [2]. The only big change was adding C Device. > > > > > > > >What do people think about removing experimental and moving the > > PyCapsule > > > >protocol to stable? > > > > > > > >This conversation started at EuroPython where some of the maintainers > > were > > > >asked how stable was the PyCapsule protocol. There was a conversation on > > > >Zulip some time ago and the feedback was positive to move the > > conversation > > > >forward. > > > > > > > >I am happy to follow up with a vote and a PR to update the documentation > > > if > > > >there's no opposition. > > > > > > > >Regards, > > > >Raúl > > > > > > > >[1] > > > > > > > > > https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/CDataInterface/PyCapsuleInterface.html > > > >[2] > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/39195#issuecomment-2245718008 > > > > >
