+1 On Wed, Oct 1, 2025 at 2:43 PM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just +1 from me. > More generally, we should do a pass on our documentation and docstrings to > find other things marked experimental that are due for an official status. > > Le 1 octobre 2025 11:38:27 GMT+02:00, "Raúl Cumplido" <[email protected]> > a écrit : > >Hi, > > > >I wanted to discuss removing the Experimental warning on the PyCapsule > >protocol documentation [1]. Now reads: > >Warning: > >The Arrow PyCapsule Interface should be considered experimental > > > >There haven't been major updates to the PyCapsule Interface during the > last > >2 years, since it was created and has seen widespread usage as tracked on > >this comment [2]. The only big change was adding C Device. > > > >What do people think about removing experimental and moving the PyCapsule > >protocol to stable? > > > >This conversation started at EuroPython where some of the maintainers were > >asked how stable was the PyCapsule protocol. There was a conversation on > >Zulip some time ago and the feedback was positive to move the conversation > >forward. > > > >I am happy to follow up with a vote and a PR to update the documentation > if > >there's no opposition. > > > >Regards, > >Raúl > > > >[1] > > > https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/CDataInterface/PyCapsuleInterface.html > >[2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/39195#issuecomment-2245718008 >
