Oh, sorry for my misunderstanding. In <CAMEXYWdO3bh5yP-Z5ft6tZ1dof8WDqTmj5BR8v6KHH=zti5...@mail.gmail.com> "Re: [VOTE] Donate Apache Arrow Erlang" on Fri, 15 May 2026 14:14:56 -0700, Benjamin Philip <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > >> It's based on bindings of the Rust implementation (for now). > > Minor nitpick: since Erlang doesn't have a Flatbuffers implementation, > we depend on generated Rust in [4] to handle IPC metadata. Apart from > that, all Arrow data is handled in pure Erlang. > > The library in [4] is no longer maintained since arrow2 has been > deprecated in favour of arrow-rs. We plan to migrate to generated C > bindings from the flatbuffers definitions in the main arrow repository. > > [4]: https://crates.io/crates/arrow-format > > -- bp > > Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> We received a proposal of donation of an Erlang >> implementation of Apache Arrow[1]. It's based on bindings of >> the Rust implementation (for now). >> >> The codebase to be donated is: >> https://github.com/Benjamin-Philip/arrow-erlang at commit >> 926bad3e4d9acfd7ec230dbde2a42bfa4f5edeee . >> >> [1] includes a discussion how to process the proposal. [2] >> is the IP clearance form for this donation. [3] and part of >> [1] include verification history of IP clearance. >> >> Please vote whether to accept the proposal. >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 Accept the donation >> [ ] +0 No opinion >> [ ] -1 Reject the donation because ... >> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/pwpm5b4v1jgosxn0hd5jtz10obfxs374 >> [2] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-erlang-library >> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/8rvtgmhhjqfcv0mp53qngbnlh8rpsmoo >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> kou
