Sound good -- I will start a new vote On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 3:25 PM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Considering this vote just started and a wrong license could be a threat > for our downstream users, I would suggest to start a new round of voting. > > But I agree that it isn’t new, so I’m not strong in this. > > I’d change my vote into +0 non-binding and leave this for you to decide. > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2026, at 02:42, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > Hi Xuanwo, > > Thank you very much. I did some research[1] and I think that file has had > a missing header line for more than 3 years. We should definitely fix this > (PR to do so here[2]) but since it isn't a regression, and we have released > many versions with this defect already, do you still think we need to > create a new RC and restart voting, or can it wait until the next release? > > Andrew > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs-object-store/issues/853 > [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs-object-store/pull/854 > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 1:20 PM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: > > -1 (non-binding) > > Thanks Andrew for preparing the release. > > The ASF license header in src/client/s3.rs is missing its > first line: > > // Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one > > The file starts with "// or more contributor license > agreements..." instead. This is present in both the source > archive and v0.14.2-rc1. > > Could we restore the complete header and cut a new RC? > > Otherwise, SHA-256, SHA-512, the signature, and the complete > source comparison against the tag passed. On Linux x86_64, > cargo build, cargo test --all --all-features, and > cargo publish --dry-run all passed. > > Cloud-backend integration tests were not exercised. > > Thanks, > Xuanwo > > > Xuanwo > > https://xuanwo.io/ > >
