+1
-Murtadha
> On May 20, 2016, at 11:16 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1
> On May 21, 2016 3:50 AM, "abdullah alamoudi" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks to Mike Blow, we now have reports of our test coverage for the code
>> base.
>> Testing is essential in controlling code quality and our current coverage
>> could use serious improvement.
>>
>> Now that we have the tools to get coverage information, I suggest we
>> establish a minimum required test coverage for all changes. We can start by
>> enforcing this on new classes while not reducing the coverage for existing
>> classes.
>>
>> I suggest we set the minimum coverage to 80%. What is nice about this is
>> that this is an objective measure and no one can claim he's being treated
>> unfairly.
>>
>> Code that is not tested is a broken code. Thoughts?
>>
