On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Murtadha Hubail <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Code that is not tested is a broken code. Thoughts? > It isn't that simple. There are lots of kinds of code for which the only possible tests are implausibly unrealistic. This is particularly true in code that wasn't designed to be tested, but it often applies to system, device level or hard real-time code. It is a good aspiration to have and I like to have high 90's coverage in code that I write (none of which is in AsterixDB, for the record). But it is very dangerous to assume that either all code can be tested or that all tested code is correct.
