@Yingyi, I’m not saying learning SQL++ is difficult. Currently, we have a class called AQLGenerator that can translate the Cloudberry request syntax to AQL. It took us several weeks finishing it. I guess it will take similar time to write a SQLPPGenerator to achieve the same goal.
As long as the RESTFul API can accept AQL, we don’t need to spend time to implement a new generator. > On Feb 3, 2017, at 6:02 PM, Yingyi Bu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> It will be a hard work to switch to SQL++. > Why translating to SQL++ is harder than AQL? I wonder if the current SQL++ > language design and implementation misses some key pieces.
