I also would vouch for keeping asterix-experiments in. 'asterix-tools' and the others could probably go.
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Taewoo Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > @Ildar: +1 > > Best, > Taewoo > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Ildar Absalyamov < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I found Young-Seok’s asterix-experiment package useful for everyone, who >> is doing any kind of experiments. >> Can we instead make an ‘asterix-contrib’ repo and move it there, the same >> way we did with asterix-bad? >> We can also launch an automated build in Jenkins to verify it builds >> against master, again the same way BAD is working. This package does not >> have a lot of dependencies, so it will be fairly painless to maintain it. >> >> > On May 31, 2017, at 09:06, Yingyi Bu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi dev, >> > >> > I wonder if the following potentially obsolete modules could be moved >> > out of the AsterixDB code base: >> > -- asterix-experiment >> > -- asterix-tools >> > -- hyracks-dist >> > -- hyracks-sever >> > >> > Any thoughts? >> > >> > Best, >> > Yingyi >> >> Best regards, >> Ildar >> >>
