+1. Best， Yingyi
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > I read this discussion that Ildar’s suggestion to move asterix-experiments > to a different repo would be a solution that works for everybody. > > Did I read that correctly or did someone disagree with such an approach? > > Cheers, > Till > > > On 31 May 2017, at 16:14, Mike Carey wrote: > > This should be decided by more knowlegeable folks than me - it just seems >> "weird" to me that that's in the main code base and not outside (as a super >> useful client package). >> >> >> On 5/31/17 4:12 PM, Chris Hillery wrote: >> >>> If we move asterix-experiments out, we would need to change the current >>> Perf job at Couchbase. However I think the change would actually make >>> that >>> job less complicated, at least if that allowed one to use a pre-compiled >>> Asterix distribution for experiments rather than requiring the full >>> source >>> code to be available. >>> >>> Ceej >>> aka Chris Hillery >>> >>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Yingyi Bu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> The code in asterix-experiments is not well organized, e.g.: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/asterixdb/tree/master/asterixdb/ >>>> asterix-experiments/src/main/java/org/apache/asterix/experiment/builder >>>> https://github.com/apache/asterixdb/tree/master/asterixdb/ >>>> asterix-experiments/src/main/java/org/apache/asterix/experiment/report >>>> >>>> Can anyone who actively uses asterix-experiments clean up the code? >>>> >>>> An alternative approach would be to put it in a separate github repo, >>>> if >>>> it is relatively independent of AsterixDB. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Yingyi >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I also would vouch for keeping asterix-experiments in. 'asterix-tools' >>>>> and the others could probably go. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Taewoo Kim <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> @Ildar: +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Taewoo >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Ildar Absalyamov < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I found Young-Seok’s asterix-experiment package useful for everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>> who >>>> >>>>> is doing any kind of experiments. >>>>>>> Can we instead make an ‘asterix-contrib’ repo and move it there, the >>>>>>> >>>>>> same >>>>> >>>>>> way we did with asterix-bad? >>>>>>> We can also launch an automated build in Jenkins to verify it builds >>>>>>> against master, again the same way BAD is working. This package does >>>>>>> >>>>>> not >>>> >>>>> have a lot of dependencies, so it will be fairly painless to maintain >>>>>>> >>>>>> it. >>>>> >>>>>> On May 31, 2017, at 09:06, Yingyi Bu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi dev, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I wonder if the following potentially obsolete modules could be >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> moved >>>>> >>>>>> out of the AsterixDB code base: >>>>>>>> -- asterix-experiment >>>>>>>> -- asterix-tools >>>>>>>> -- hyracks-dist >>>>>>>> -- hyracks-sever >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any thoughts? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Yingyi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Ildar >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>
