I’ll give the BADest +1 I can :)
Steven

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:50 PM Gerald Sangudi <[email protected]> wrote:

> :-)
>
> On Sep 7, 2017 11:44 AM, "Michael Carey" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> As AsterixDB evolves, and additional features are added - e.g., DISTINCT
> aggregate support, or properly implemented query-bodied functions,
> supporting two query languages is hugely expensive:  Updating two grammars,
> parsers, rules, tests, ... IMO it is time to let go of AQL as an externally
> supported interface to AsterixDB and only have SQL++ going forward.  I
> think "everyone" has migrated - and if not we should force that migration.
> (Cloudberry is on SQL++ nowadays, BAD is on SQL++ nowadays, ...)  Any
> objections?  If not, I think we should make this decision officially and
> stop putting energy into carrying the AQL legacy around with us.  Thoughts?
>

Reply via email to