I think this seals it :)
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:49, Gerald Sangudi <[email protected]> wrote: > > :-) > > On Sep 7, 2017 11:44 AM, "Michael Carey" <[email protected]> wrote: > > As AsterixDB evolves, and additional features are added - e.g., DISTINCT > aggregate support, or properly implemented query-bodied functions, > supporting two query languages is hugely expensive: Updating two grammars, > parsers, rules, tests, ... IMO it is time to let go of AQL as an externally > supported interface to AsterixDB and only have SQL++ going forward. I > think "everyone" has migrated - and if not we should force that migration. > (Cloudberry is on SQL++ nowadays, BAD is on SQL++ nowadays, ...) Any > objections? If not, I think we should make this decision officially and > stop putting energy into carrying the AQL legacy around with us. Thoughts?
