Okay, my understanding was that things that aren't for end users (such as my serialization doc) wouldn't go on the git website, but it doesn't matter much to me. Steven
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that the determining factor is where you think it should be put. > > I'm not a big fan of Wikis. I think that they are ok for temporary stuff > (status reports, idea collections, ..). But anything that might be relevant > a bit longer, I'd prefer to see in git. > But then that's just my opinion (at this point in time :) ), and I'd be > fine to have the documents in a Wiki if that works better for most other > people. > That's why I put numbers into the spreadsheet so that everybody can > increment the number for their preferred option. > > Cheers, > Till > > > On Apr 19, 2015, at 15:09, Steven Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > What is the determining factor between the Confluence Wiki and the git > > website? > > Steven > > > >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> AsterixDB developers: As was mentioned last week, we are going to > >> migrate (now!) our content from the Coogle code and UCI (grape) wiki > worlds > >> into Apache-land. Till's reference [2] below is a list of all > >> documents/notes that should be moved. We won't throw out ancient > history > >> at UCI, but we needn't move it - we should only move things from grape > to > >> Apache that are current/relevant/helpful - and we will soon lose all our > >> Google-resident stuff. > >> > >> PLEASE: Have a look at the Google doc (reference [2]) and add things to > >> the list that you think need to be added. @Steven, @Keren, make sure > your > >> stuff is there - @Chris, the same for anything you might have created - > >> ditto for others. Thanks!! Anything that is not on the list by this > >> coming Friday (4/24) will be deemed unnecessary - and there is surely > more > >> that's necessary to preserve than what's listed so far. Please ask Till > >> and I if you have questions about anything in terms of its relevance. > Thx! > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Mike > >> > >> On 4/14/15 10:05 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> in addition to the migration of code and bugs (which should happen in > bulk) we also need to migrate our Wiki content. > >> So far Wiki content is distributed on 3 Wikis (Hyracks, AsterixDB, and > Grape) and for each page we have up to 4 options > >> 1) leave it where it is (only for Grape) > >> 2) move to the confluence wiki [1] > >> 3) add it to the website that is managed in git > >> 4) abandon the page (maybe some stuff is a little outdated). > >> > >> I’ve created a Google spreadsheet [2] to help with the process. It > lists some pages grouped by Wiki. > >> For pages that are not listed, I suggest to either abandon them (Google > Code Wikis) or leave them as-is (Grape Wiki). > >> For each page that is listed, we can vote for 1 of the 4 options by > adding 1 to the column of the option. > >> I’ve pre-populated the sheet with my votes so far. > >> Please add pages that should be migrated as well and vote for the > existing ones. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Till > >> > >> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/ <https://cwiki.apache.org/> < > https://cwiki.apache.org/> > >> [2] http://s.apache.org/0HfX <http://s.apache.org/0HfX> < > http://s.apache.org/0HfX> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "asterixdb-dev" group. > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > >> email to [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "asterixdb-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >
